Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;18(3):917-928. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
Some persons who smoke have substituted e-cigarettes for tobacco cigarettes, either completely or partially. What effect does this have on cardiovascular functioning? We conducted a living systematic review on human clinical studies measuring the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking. The Scopus, PubMed, and CENTRAL Cochrane Library databases were searched on January 31 and April 29, 2021. Three secondary searches and a grey literature search were conducted. Included study designs were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental clinical trials, and cohort studies. Risk of bias and study quality were evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal tools and the Oxford Catalogue of Bias. The systematic review covered 25 studies comprising 1810 participants who smoked. Twenty studies were rated at high risk of bias, and five as some concerns. A tabular synthesis by direction of effect was conducted due to heterogeneity in the data. Nearly two-thirds of the test analyses indicated that e-cigarette use had no significance difference compared with tobacco cigarettes on heart rate, blood pressure, and in other cardiovascular tests. In two studies, participants with hypertension experienced a clinically relevant reduction in systolic blood pressure after 1 year of e-cigarette use. E-cigarette substitution incurs no additional cardiovascular risks, and some possible benefits may be obtained, but the evidence is of low to very low certainty. An update search on May 30, 2022 retrieved five studies that did not alter our conclusion.Registration PROSPERO #CRD42021239094.
一些吸烟的人已经完全或部分地将电子烟替代了传统香烟。这对心血管功能有什么影响呢?我们对测量电子烟替代吸烟对心血管影响的人类临床研究进行了一次实时系统综述。我们于 2021 年 1 月 31 日和 4 月 29 日检索了 Scopus、PubMed 和 CENTRAL Cochrane Library 数据库。进行了三次二次检索和一次灰色文献检索。纳入的研究设计包括随机对照试验、准实验性临床试验和队列研究。使用 JBI 批判性评估工具和牛津偏倚目录评估了风险和研究质量。该系统综述涵盖了 25 项研究,共包括 1810 名吸烟参与者。20 项研究被评为高偏倚风险,5 项研究存在一些关注。由于数据的异质性,我们进行了按效应方向的表格综合分析。近三分之二的测试分析表明,电子烟的使用与传统香烟相比,在心率、血压和其他心血管测试方面没有显著差异。在两项研究中,高血压患者在使用电子烟 1 年后,收缩压出现了临床相关的降低。电子烟替代吸烟不会带来额外的心血管风险,而且可能会有一些益处,但证据的确定性为低到极低。2022 年 5 月 30 日的更新检索获取了五项并未改变我们结论的研究。注册 PROSPERO #CRD42021239094。