Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Dr Antoni Jurasz University Hospital No. 1, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 22;24(1):179. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010179.
infections, as one of the most prevalent among humans, are generally acquired during childhood, and are one of the main causes of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. A bacterial culture from a gastric biopsy is the gold standard and is the only method that has 100% specificity. However, its sensitivity varies, depending on experience of the laboratory staff, applied culture media, specimen transport conditions, biopsy site, and quality of the sample. The same factors compromise all invasive methods and a culture-based infection diagnostic, as well as a recent intake of antibiotics, bismuth-containing compounds, and proton pump inhibitors. Molecular methods have been used for clinical microbiology investigation since the beginning of the 21st century. However, their usefulness for infections diagnosis remains unclear, especially in pediatric patients. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of infections in a group of 104 pediatric patients and to compare the results of the PCR test with the corresponding histopathological investigation effects. Among the biopsy samples collected from 104 children, 44 (42.3%) were positive in PCR, while 43 (41.3%) and 39 (37.5%) presented histologically-confirmed signs of inflammation and colonization, respectively. Moreover, the mean grades of the parameters of the histopathological examination were higher in the group of PCR-positive samples. The compatibility of both research methods was confirmed, emphasizing the usefulness of molecular methods for detecting infections in pediatric patients. Considering that the PCR-based method gives reliable results and is less time-consuming and costly, it is worth discussing this method as a new standard in the diagnosis of infections, at least among pediatric patients, for which culture-based diagnostics is not sufficient or histopathological examination is negative, while inflammation signs are observed macroscopically.
感染是人类中最常见的疾病之一,通常在儿童时期获得,是慢性胃炎和消化性溃疡病的主要病因之一。胃活检的细菌培养是金标准,也是唯一具有 100%特异性的方法。然而,其灵敏度因实验室人员的经验、应用的培养介质、标本运输条件、活检部位和样本质量的不同而有所差异。同样的因素也会影响所有侵入性方法和基于培养的感染诊断,以及最近使用的抗生素、含铋化合物和质子泵抑制剂。分子方法自 21 世纪初以来就被用于临床微生物学研究。然而,它们在感染诊断中的有用性仍不清楚,尤其是在儿科患者中。本研究旨在评估一组 104 例儿科患者中感染的发生率,并比较 PCR 检测结果与相应的组织病理学检查结果。在从 104 例儿童采集的活检样本中,44 例(42.3%)PCR 检测阳性,而 43 例(41.3%)和 39 例(37.5%)分别组织学证实有炎症和定植迹象。此外,PCR 阳性样本的组织病理学检查参数的平均等级更高。两种研究方法的一致性得到了证实,强调了分子方法在检测儿科患者感染中的有用性。鉴于基于 PCR 的方法可提供可靠的结果,且耗时和成本更低,因此值得讨论将该方法作为感染诊断的新标准,至少在儿科患者中是如此,因为基于培养的诊断方法不充分或组织病理学检查呈阴性,但宏观上观察到炎症迹象。