Delpech Célia, Laborne François-Xavier, Hilliquin Pascal
Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier du Sud Francilien, 91100 Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
Clinical Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier du Sud Francilien, 91100 Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):286. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010286.
Update the available evidence comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (CsDMARDs) to bDMARDs in monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Research was limited to randomized controlled trials. Major outcome: ACR 20 response criteria at 24 weeks.
clinical and radiographic criteria at week 24, 52 and 104.
23 trials (6358 patients), including seven bDMARDs and one other molecule: Anbainuo (anti-TNF-R). No study satisfied our search criteria for anakinra, certolizumab and infliximab. Compared to bDMARD monotherapy, combination therapy gives a better ACR 20 at 24 weeks (RR: 0.88 (0.84-0.94)) in fixed and random effect models, and this result is sustained at 52 and 104 weeks. The results were mostly similar for all other outcomes without increasing the risk of adverse effects.
This meta-analysis confirms the superiority of combination therapy over monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis, in accordance to the usual guidelines.
更新现有证据,比较生物性改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)联合传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(CsDMARDs)与bDMARDs单药治疗类风湿关节炎患者的疗效。
研究限于随机对照试验。主要结局:24周时达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)20反应标准。
第24、52和104周时的临床和影像学标准。
23项试验(6358例患者),包括7种bDMARDs和另一种药物:安巴诺(抗TNF-R)。没有研究符合我们对阿那白滞素、赛妥珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗的检索标准。与bDMARDs单药治疗相比,在固定效应模型和随机效应模型中,联合治疗在24周时达到ACR 20的效果更好(相对危险度:0.88(0.84-0.94)),且在52周和104周时该结果持续存在。所有其他结局的结果大多相似,且未增加不良反应风险。
这项荟萃分析证实了联合治疗在类风湿关节炎中优于单药治疗,符合通常的指南。