Digital Health and Biomedical Technologies Department, Vicomtech Foundation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
eHealth Group, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Jun;62(S 01):e19-e38. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760247. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
Synthetic tabular data generation is a potentially valuable technology with great promise for data augmentation and privacy preservation. However, prior to adoption, an empirical assessment of generated synthetic tabular data is required across dimensions relevant to the target application to determine its efficacy. A lack of standardized and objective evaluation and benchmarking strategy for synthetic tabular data in the health domain has been found in the literature.
The aim of this paper is to identify key dimensions, per dimension metrics, and methods for evaluating synthetic tabular data generated with different techniques and configurations for health domain application development and to provide a strategy to orchestrate them.
Based on the literature, the resemblance, utility, and privacy dimensions have been prioritized, and a collection of metrics and methods for their evaluation are orchestrated into a complete evaluation pipeline. This way, a guided and comparative assessment of generated synthetic tabular data can be done, categorizing its quality into three categories ("" "" and ""). Six health care-related datasets and four synthetic tabular data generation approaches have been chosen to conduct an analysis and evaluation to verify the utility of the proposed evaluation pipeline.
The synthetic tabular data generated with the four selected approaches has maintained resemblance, utility, and privacy for most datasets and synthetic tabular data generation approach combination. In several datasets, some approaches have outperformed others, while in other datasets, more than one approach has yielded the same performance.
The results have shown that the proposed pipeline can effectively be used to evaluate and benchmark the synthetic tabular data generated by various synthetic tabular data generation approaches. Therefore, this pipeline can support the scientific community in selecting the most suitable synthetic tabular data generation approaches for their data and application of interest.
合成表格数据生成是一项具有巨大潜力的技术,可用于数据扩充和隐私保护。然而,在采用之前,需要针对目标应用相关的各个维度对生成的合成表格数据进行实证评估,以确定其效果。在文献中发现,健康领域的合成表格数据缺乏标准化和客观的评估和基准测试策略。
本文旨在确定用于健康领域应用开发的不同技术和配置生成的合成表格数据的关键维度、每个维度的指标以及评估方法,并提供一种协调这些方法的策略。
基于文献,优先考虑相似性、实用性和隐私性维度,并将用于评估这些维度的一系列指标和方法协调到一个完整的评估管道中。这样,可以对生成的合成表格数据进行有指导和比较的评估,将其质量分为三个类别(“优”、“良”和“差”)。选择了六个与医疗保健相关的数据集和四种合成表格数据生成方法来进行分析和评估,以验证所提出的评估管道的实用性。
在所选择的四种方法生成的合成表格数据中,大多数数据集和合成表格数据生成方法组合都保持了相似性、实用性和隐私性。在一些数据集中,某些方法的表现优于其他方法,而在其他数据集中,多种方法的表现相同。
结果表明,所提出的管道可有效地用于评估和基准测试各种合成表格数据生成方法生成的合成表格数据。因此,该管道可以为科学界提供支持,帮助他们选择最适合其感兴趣的数据和应用的合成表格数据生成方法。