Vieira Thiago Isidro, Cavalcanti Yuri Wanderley, de Sousa Simone Alves, Santiago Bianca Marques, Oliveira Luciana Butini, Bitencourt Fernando Valentim, De Luca Canto Graziela, Pauletto Patrícia
Centro de Ciências da Saúde - Térreo, Federal University of Paraíba, Campus I - Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, 58051900, Brazil.
São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar;27(3):943-953. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04856-5. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
This systematic review investigated the prevalence of tooth wear between patients with and without Down syndrome.
Six databases (Embase, LILACS, Livivo, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and grey literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey and ProQuest) were searched until March 7, 2022. Observational studies were included to assess the differences in tooth wear prevalence and/or severity in Down syndrome and non-syndromic controls. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were followed. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality (Joanna Briggs Institute) and graded the certainty of evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results were summarized through meta-analyses using a random-effects model. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021266997).
Of the 1382 records identified, six cross-sectional studies were included. Individuals with Down syndrome had a higher prevalence and were more likely to have tooth wear than individuals without Down syndrome (44% × 15%; OR = 4.43; 95% CI 3.17-6.18; p < 0.00001; I = 8%). Also, the severity of tooth wear was higher in the Down syndrome group (n = 275) compared with the controls (n = 294). The certainty of evidence analysis was very low.
Based on very low certainty of the evidence, patients with Down syndrome had a higher prevalence and likelihood and severity of tooth wear when compared to those without Down syndrome.
Screening early tooth wear lesions should be carefully done in the Down syndrome population since its occurrence is remarkable compared to the general population.
本系统评价调查了唐氏综合征患者与非唐氏综合征患者牙齿磨损的患病率。
检索了6个数据库(Embase、LILACS、Livivo、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)以及灰色文献(谷歌学术、OpenGrey和ProQuest),检索截止至2022年3月7日。纳入观察性研究以评估唐氏综合征患者与非综合征对照组在牙齿磨损患病率和/或严重程度上的差异。遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议。三名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据、评估方法学质量(乔安娜·布里格斯研究所),并通过推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据的确定性进行分级。结果通过随机效应模型进行Meta分析进行总结。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(CRD42021266997)。
在识别出的1382条记录中,纳入了6项横断面研究。唐氏综合征患者的牙齿磨损患病率高于非唐氏综合征患者,且更有可能出现牙齿磨损(44%×15%;OR = 4.43;95%CI 3.17 - 6.18;p < 0.00001;I² = 8%)。此外,与对照组(n = 294)相比,唐氏综合征组(n = 275)的牙齿磨损严重程度更高。证据确定性分析的可信度非常低。
基于证据的可信度非常低,与非唐氏综合征患者相比,唐氏综合征患者牙齿磨损的患病率、可能性和严重程度更高。
鉴于唐氏综合征人群中早期牙齿磨损病变的发生率与普通人群相比显著升高,应对该人群进行早期牙齿磨损病变的仔细筛查。