Glasgow Computational Engineering Centre, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LT, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Biomechanics and Biomaterials Design Laboratory, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, 73019, OK, United States of America.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Feb;138:105657. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105657. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
A variety of constitutive models have been developed for soft tissue mechanics. However, there is no established criterion to select a suitable model for a specific application. Although the model that best fits the experimental data can be deemed the most suitable model, this practice often can be insufficient given the inter-sample variability of experimental observations. Herein, we present a Bayesian approach to calculate the relative probabilities of constitutive models based on biaxial mechanical testing of tissue samples. Forty-six samples of porcine aortic valve tissue were tested using a biaxial stretching setup. For each sample, seven ratios of stresses along and perpendicular to the fiber direction were applied. The probabilities of eight invariant-based constitutive models were calculated based on the experimental data using the proposed model selection framework. The calculated probabilities showed that, out of the considered models and based on the information available through the utilized experimental dataset, the May-Newman model was the most probable model for the porcine aortic valve data. When the samples were further grouped into different cusp types, the May-Newman model remained the most probable for the left- and right-coronary cusps, whereas for non-coronary cusps two models were found to be equally probable: the Lee-Sacks model and the May-Newman model. This difference between cusp types was found to be associated with the first principal component analysis (PCA) mode, where this mode's amplitudes of the non-coronary and right-coronary cusps were found to be significantly different. Our results show that a PCA-based statistical model can capture significant variations in the mechanical properties of soft tissues. The presented framework is applicable to other tissue types, and has the potential to provide a structured and rational way of making simulations population-based.
已经开发出多种用于软组织力学的本构模型。然而,对于特定应用,没有确定的标准来选择合适的模型。尽管最符合实验数据的模型可以被认为是最合适的模型,但由于实验观察的样本间变异性,这种做法往往是不够的。在此,我们提出了一种基于组织样本双轴力学测试的贝叶斯方法来计算本构模型的相对概率。使用双轴拉伸装置对 46 个猪主动脉瓣组织样本进行了测试。对于每个样本,沿纤维方向和垂直于纤维方向施加了七个应力比。使用提出的模型选择框架,根据实验数据计算了 8 个基于不变量的本构模型的概率。计算出的概率表明,在所考虑的模型中,基于通过使用的实验数据集获得的信息,May-Newman 模型是猪主动脉瓣数据最可能的模型。当进一步将样本分为不同的瓣叶类型时,May-Newman 模型仍然是左冠和右冠瓣叶最可能的模型,而对于非冠瓣叶,有两个模型被认为是同样可能的:Lee-Sacks 模型和 May-Newman 模型。瓣叶类型之间的这种差异与第一主成分分析(PCA)模式有关,其中该模式的非冠和右冠瓣叶的幅度明显不同。我们的结果表明,基于 PCA 的统计模型可以捕捉软组织力学性能的显著变化。所提出的框架适用于其他组织类型,并有潜力提供一种基于人群的模拟结构化和合理的方法。