Ulster University, UK.
Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jan;25(1):231-245. doi: 10.1177/15248380221147558. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
Lack of sexual consent forms the foundation of unwanted (and nonconsensual) sexual experiences (USEs), yet research suggests it is not well understood amongst university students. While the prevalence of USEs has been well documented within the university context, less is known about how sexual consent is defined or measured. This review aims to identify a consistent sexual consent definition and how current research examining USEs defines and measures sexual consent amongst university students. A systematic review of nine electronic databases (2000-2022) was conducted, and the results were assessed against inclusion criteria (e.g., studies had to focus exclusively on university students). Thirty-three articles were identified and reviewed against the study aims. Sexual consent was more often implicitly defined across measures and articles. Four themes were identified (incapacitation, use of force, use of threats, and lack of wantedness) across the implicit definitions but varied by study with some implicitly defining sexual consent within the context of a relationship. Only three studies explicitly defined sexual consent, referring to it as a willingness to engage in sexual behavior. Measures assessed sexual consent communication or, attitudes and behaviors that might predict sexual aggression. Two studies examined students' individual sexual consent conceptualizations. Sexual consent appears to be contextual so future research should examine the variability of sexual consent in student samples. Students may indeed rely on implicit sexual consent definitions (rather than explicit) but more research is needed. Lastly, researchers should take care to be clear on their sexual consent definitions, both in text and within measures.
缺乏性同意是造成非意愿(和非自愿)性经历(USEs)的基础,但研究表明,大学生群体对此并没有很好的理解。虽然在大学环境中已经充分记录了 USEs 的普遍性,但对于性同意的定义或衡量标准知之甚少。本综述旨在确定一个一致的性同意定义,并了解当前研究如何在大学生群体中定义和衡量性同意。对九个电子数据库(2000-2022 年)进行了系统回顾,并根据纳入标准(例如,研究必须专门针对大学生)对结果进行评估。确定了 33 篇文章,并根据研究目的进行了审查。在衡量标准和文章中,性同意更多地是隐含定义的。在隐含定义中确定了四个主题(丧失能力、使用武力、使用威胁和缺乏意愿),但因研究而异,有些隐含地在关系背景下定义性同意。只有三项研究明确定义了性同意,将其定义为愿意参与性行为。衡量标准评估了性行为同意的沟通或可能预测性侵犯的态度和行为。两项研究检验了学生个人的性行为同意概念化。性行为同意似乎是上下文相关的,因此未来的研究应该检查学生样本中性行为同意的可变性。学生可能确实依赖于隐含的性行为同意定义(而不是明确的),但需要更多的研究。最后,研究人员应该注意在文本和衡量标准中明确他们的性行为同意定义。