男同性恋者是否在改变性同意的概念？对男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿男性中性同意文献的范围综述。
Are Queer Men Queering Consent? A Scoping Review of Sexual Consent Literature Among Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Men.
作者信息
Webber Val, McCready Samantha, Yurkovich Claire, Dietzel Christopher, Feicht Becky, Joy Phillip, Holmes Dave, Numer Matthew
机构信息
School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Canada.
出版信息
Int J Sex Health. 2024 Jun 7;36(3):359-383. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2360727. eCollection 2024.
OBJECTIVES
To review the literature on Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer (GBTQ) men and sexual consent.
METHODS
Eight electronic databases were searched in June 2022, yielding 1924 articles; 30 were included for review after screening.
RESULTS
We found a growing body of literature focused on GBTQ men, with an increasingly intersectional lens. Most studies adopted a nuanced definition of sexual consent. Many discussed the unique sexual scripts developed by GBTQ men to communicate consent, especially in sex venues, and how unfamiliarity with these scripts creates vulnerability for newly "out" men. A common theme was the impact of heteromasculine norms on sexual encounters between GBTQ men.
CONCLUSIONS
The reviewed literature problematizes binary definitions of consent and miscommunication theories of assault. It both celebrates and problematizes GBTQ sexual cultures. We encourage future research to adopt more explicitly anti-carceral approaches to studying sexual consent and violence.
目的
回顾关于男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿（GBTQ）男性与性同意的文献。
方法
于2022年6月检索了八个电子数据库，共获得1924篇文章；经筛选后纳入30篇进行综述。
结果
我们发现关于GBTQ男性的文献越来越多，且视角日益多元化。大多数研究采用了细致入微的性同意定义。许多研究讨论了GBTQ男性为传达同意而形成的独特性脚本，尤其是在性场所，以及对这些脚本的不熟悉如何使新出柜的男性变得脆弱。一个共同主题是异性恋男性规范对GBTQ男性之间性接触的影响。
结论
所综述的文献对同意的二元定义和攻击的沟通失误理论提出了质疑。它既颂扬了GBTQ性文化，也对其提出了质疑。我们鼓励未来的研究采用更明确的反监禁方法来研究性同意和暴力。
Zotero 插件