Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
NeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Cerebellum. 2024 Feb;23(1):121-135. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01514-8. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
Characterizing bedside oculomotor deficits is a critical factor in defining the clinical presentation of hereditary ataxias. Quantitative assessments are increasingly available and have significant advantages, including comparability over time, reduced examiner dependency, and sensitivity to subtle changes. To delineate the potential of quantitative oculomotor assessments as digital-motor outcome measures for clinical trials in ataxia, we searched MEDLINE for articles reporting on quantitative eye movement recordings in genetically confirmed or suspected hereditary ataxias, asking which paradigms are most promising for capturing disease progression and treatment response. Eighty-nine manuscripts identified reported on 1541 patients, including spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA2, n = 421), SCA3 (n = 268), SCA6 (n = 117), other SCAs (n = 97), Friedreich ataxia (FRDA, n = 178), Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC, n = 57), and ataxia-telangiectasia (n = 85) as largest cohorts. Whereas most studies reported discriminatory power of oculomotor assessments in diagnostics, few explored their value for monitoring genotype-specific disease progression (n = 2; SCA2) or treatment response (n = 8; SCA2, FRDA, NPC, ataxia-telangiectasia, episodic-ataxia 4). Oculomotor parameters correlated with disease severity measures including clinical scores (n = 18 studies (SARA: n = 9)), chronological measures (e.g., age, disease duration, time-to-symptom onset; n = 17), genetic stratification (n = 9), and imaging measures of atrophy (n = 5). Recurrent correlations across many ataxias (SCA2/3/17, FRDA, NPC) suggest saccadic eye movements as potentially generic quantitative oculomotor outcome. Recommendation of other paradigms was limited by the scarcity of cross-validating correlations, except saccadic intrusions (FRDA), pursuit eye movements (SCA17), and quantitative head-impulse testing (SCA3/6). This work aids in understanding the current knowledge of quantitative oculomotor parameters in hereditary ataxias, and identifies gaps for validation as potential trial outcome measures in specific ataxia genotypes.
描述床边眼球运动缺陷是定义遗传性共济失调临床表现的关键因素。定量评估越来越普及,具有显著优势,包括随时间的可比性、减少对检查者的依赖以及对细微变化的敏感性。为了阐明定量眼球运动评估作为临床试验中共济失调的数字运动结局测量的潜力,我们在 MEDLINE 中搜索了报告遗传性共济失调中定量眼动记录的文章,询问哪些范式最有希望捕捉疾病进展和治疗反应。确定的 89 篇文献报告了 1541 名患者,包括脊髓小脑性共济失调(SCA2,n=421)、SCA3(n=268)、SCA6(n=117)、其他 SCA(n=97)、弗里德里希共济失调(FRDA,n=178)、尼曼-皮克病 C 型(NPC,n=57)和共济失调-毛细血管扩张症(n=85)。虽然大多数研究报告了眼球运动评估在诊断中的区分能力,但很少有研究探索其监测基因型特异性疾病进展(n=2;SCA2)或治疗反应(n=8;SCA2、FRDA、NPC、共济失调-毛细血管扩张症、发作性共济失调 4)的价值。眼球运动参数与疾病严重程度测量相关,包括临床评分(n=18 项研究(SARA:n=9))、时间测量(例如年龄、疾病持续时间、症状发作时间;n=17)、遗传分层(n=9)和萎缩的影像学测量(n=5)。许多共济失调(SCA2/3/17、FRDA、NPC)中经常出现的相关性表明,扫视眼动可能是潜在的通用定量眼球运动结局。除了扫视性侵入(FRDA)、追踪眼球运动(SCA17)和定量头部脉冲测试(SCA3/6)外,其他范式的推荐受到交叉验证相关性稀缺的限制。这项工作有助于了解遗传性共济失调中定量眼球运动参数的现有知识,并确定了特定共济失调基因型中潜在试验结局测量的验证差距。