Safiya S Nehal, Veeraraghavan Vishnu Priya, Arthanari Abirami, Gayathri R, Selvaraj J, Kavitha S, Dinesh Y
Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Forensic Odontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S112-S116. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_258_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
For nearly a century, hairs of animals and humans were employed in forensic research. It is found to be stable in certain environments, and thus, they are frequently retrieved at scenes of crime, and it is important to verify whether they are either human or animal. The present research was done at comparing the morphological differences among human hair and animal hair using a stereomicroscope. Samples of hair forming the outer coat of some autochthonous domestic and human remnants were evaluated in this study. Long strands of guard hair shaft were investigated by stereomicroscope accordingly. Microphotographs were taken in an iPad camera. The microscopic characteristics of cat hair samples showed the presence of small spikes on the surface, whereas the human hair sample showed a smooth appearance with no irregularities. The microscopic analyses of the human hair sample and cat hair sample under stereomicroscope suggest hair samples can be used as forensic evidence in crime scene investigation. The comparison of both the hair samples was done, and the differences were significantly evident.
近一个世纪以来,动物和人类的毛发一直被用于法医研究。人们发现它在某些环境中很稳定,因此,它们经常在犯罪现场被找到,而核实它们是人类的还是动物的毛发很重要。本研究旨在使用体视显微镜比较人类毛发和动物毛发的形态差异。本研究评估了一些本地家养动物和人类残骸外层毛发的样本。相应地,通过体视显微镜对长而粗的护毛进行了研究。用iPad相机拍摄了显微照片。猫毛样本的微观特征显示其表面有小刺,而人类毛发样本则呈现出光滑无异常的外观。在体视显微镜下对人类毛发样本和猫毛样本进行的微观分析表明,毛发样本可作为犯罪现场调查的法医证据。对两种毛发样本进行了比较,差异非常明显。