Department of Urologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 May;19(5):e784-e793. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00634. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Testing for pathogenic variants can aid in oncologic risk stratification and identification of targeted therapies. Despite known disparities in access to prostate cancer (PCa) care, little has been written about access to germline genetic testing (GGT) for Black men and other historically marginalized populations. This systematic review sought to delineate racial/ethnic disparities in GGT for PCa.
This systematic review identified articles published from January 1996 through May 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. We included studies that reported rates of GGT in men with PCa in the United States by race/ethnicity as reflective of routine clinical care or research. A narrative synthesis was performed.
Of 4,309 unique records, 91 studies examining 50 unique study populations met inclusion criteria. Of these, four populations included men who received GGT through routine clinical care, accounting for 4,415 men (72.6% White and 7.2% Black). The other 46 populations included men who received GGT as part of a research study, accounting for 30,824 men (64.3% White and 21.6% Black). Of these 46 research populations, 19 used targeted methods to increase recruitment from a specific demographic.
Most studies that report GGT rates by race/ethnicity are in research settings. Many of these studies used targeted recruitment methods and subsequently have a greater proportion of Black men than clinical and US population-based studies. Other historically marginalized populations are not well represented. There remains a knowledge gap regarding the extent of racial disparities in the use of GGT, particularly in the clinical setting.
检测致病变异有助于肿瘤风险分层和靶向治疗的识别。尽管已知在获得前列腺癌 (PCa) 治疗方面存在差异,但关于黑人和其他历史上被边缘化人群进行种系基因检测 (GGT) 的机会,却鲜有报道。本系统评价旨在阐明 GGT 在 PCa 中的种族/民族差异。
本系统评价从 1996 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 中检索了相关文献。我们纳入了在美国按种族/民族报告 PCa 男性 GGT 率的研究,以反映常规临床护理或研究情况。采用叙述性综合分析。
在 4309 篇独特记录中,有 91 项研究符合纳入标准,共涉及 50 个不同的研究人群。其中,有 4 个人群的研究对象通过常规临床护理接受了 GGT,共 4415 人(72.6%为白人,7.2%为黑人)。其余 46 个人群的研究对象接受 GGT 是作为研究的一部分,共 30824 人(64.3%为白人,21.6%为黑人)。在这 46 个研究人群中,有 19 个使用了有针对性的方法来增加特定人群的招募。
大多数按种族/民族报告 GGT 率的研究都是在研究环境中进行的。其中许多研究采用了有针对性的招募方法,因此黑人男性的比例高于临床和基于美国人口的研究。其他历史上被边缘化的人群则没有得到很好的代表。在 GGT 使用方面的种族差异程度,特别是在临床环境中,仍然存在知识差距。