Suppr超能文献

运用实证方法了解前列腺癌健康差距:黑人和白人男性全社区关联研究“命中”结果的比较。

Use of empiric methods to inform prostate cancer health disparities: Comparison of neighborhood-wide association study "hits" in black and white men.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Population Studies Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1949-1957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32734. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Black men are more likely to die of prostate cancer (PCa) compared with white men. Factors ranging from genetics to neighborhood environment contribute to these disparities. However, unlike genetics, agnostic investigations that identify candidate variables from large-scale data, and that allow for empiric investigations into differential associations between neighborhood and PCa by race/ethnicity, to the authors' knowledge have not been well explored. Thus, herein, the authors built on their previously developed, empiric neighborhood-wide association study (NWAS) in white men and conducted a NWAS in black men to determine whether findings differed by race.

METHODS

Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data were linked to US Census data. For the NWAS in non-Hispanic black men, the authors evaluated the association between 14,663 neighborhood census variables and advanced PCa (11 high-stage and/or high-grade cases and 8632 low-stage and/or low-grade cases), adjusting for age, diagnosis year, spatial correlation, and multiple testing. Odds ratios and 95% credible intervals were reported. Replication of NWAS findings across black and white races was assessed using Bayesian mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Five variables related to housing (3 variables), education (1 variable), and employment and/or transportation (1 variable) were found to be significantly associated with advanced PCa in black men compared with 17 socioeconomic variables (mostly related to poverty and/or income) in white men. The top hit in black men was related to crowding in renter-occupied housing (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% credible interval, 1.001-1.12). Nine of 22 NWAS hits (4 of 5 hits in black men) were replicated across racial/ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Different neighborhood variables, or "candidates," were identified across race-specific NWASs. These findings and empiric approaches warrant additional study and may inform PCa racial disparities, particularly future gene-environment studies aimed at identifying patients and/or communities at risk of advanced PCa.

摘要

背景

与白人男性相比,黑人男性更有可能死于前列腺癌(PCa)。造成这些差异的因素既有遗传因素,也有邻里环境因素。然而,与遗传因素不同,基于大样本数据的、不具偏向性的调查可以识别候选变量,并允许对不同种族/族裔之间的邻里环境与 PCa 之间的差异关联进行实证研究,但据作者所知,此类调查尚未得到充分探索。因此,作者在此基础上扩展了之前在白人男性中开展的、基于经验的全邻里关联研究(NWAS),并对黑人男性进行了 NWAS,以确定研究结果是否因种族而异。

方法

宾夕法尼亚癌症登记处的数据与美国人口普查数据相关联。在非西班牙裔黑人男性的 NWAS 中,作者评估了 14663 个邻里普查变量与晚期 PCa(11 例高分期/高分级病例和 8632 例低分期/低分级病例)之间的关联,同时调整了年龄、诊断年份、空间相关性和多次检验。报告了比值比和 95%可信区间。使用贝叶斯混合效应模型评估了 NWAS 结果在黑人和白人种族之间的复制情况。

结果

与白人男性中与 17 个社会经济变量(主要与贫困和/或收入有关)相关的情况相比,发现黑人男性中有 5 个与住房(3 个变量)、教育(1 个变量)和就业/交通(1 个变量)相关的变量与晚期 PCa 显著相关。黑人男性中排名最高的是与租客居住住房拥挤有关的变量(比值比,1.10;95%可信区间,1.001-1.12)。22 个 NWAS 命中中有 9 个(黑人男性中的 4 个命中)在不同种族/族裔群体中得到复制。

结论

在特定种族的 NWAS 中确定了不同的邻里变量或“候选变量”。这些发现和实证方法值得进一步研究,并可能为 PCa 种族差异提供信息,特别是未来旨在识别高危患者和/或社区的基因-环境研究。

相似文献

2
A Neighborhood-Wide Association Study (NWAS): Example of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 27;12(3):e0174548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174548. eCollection 2017.
4
The effect of neighborhood social environment on prostate cancer development in black and white men at high risk for prostate cancer.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237332. eCollection 2020.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prostate Cancer Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144027. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44027.
6
Racial and Ethnic Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Philadelphia, PA: an Observational Study.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Apr;6(2):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00534-z. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
7
Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on disparities in prostate cancer survival.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;53:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Racial Differences in the Surgical Care of Medicare Beneficiaries With Localized Prostate Cancer.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3384.
10
Contributions of Social Factors to Disparities in Prostate Cancer Risk Profiles among Black Men and Non-Hispanic White Men with Prostate Cancer in California.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Feb;31(2):404-412. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0697. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

2
Does inclusion of neighborhood variables improve clinical risk prediction for advanced prostate cancer in Black and White men?
Urol Oncol. 2025 May;43(5):334.e17-334.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.021. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
4
Patient-Derived Conditionally Reprogrammed Cells in Prostate Cancer Research.
Cells. 2024 Jun 8;13(12):1005. doi: 10.3390/cells13121005.
6
The role of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage in racial disparities in cancer incidence in metropolitan Detroit.
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14623-14635. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6065. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Population-Level Patterns of Prostate Cancer Occurrence: Disparities in Virginia.
Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Mar;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40610-022-00147-w. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Systematic review of neighborhood socioeconomic indices studied across the cancer control continuum.
Cancer Med. 2022 May;11(10):2125-2144. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4601. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Housing discrimination and racial cancer disparities among the 100 largest US metropolitan areas.
Cancer. 2019 Nov 1;125(21):3818-3827. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32358. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5):479-505. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023.
3
Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):509-516. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001032.
4
Geographical Variations in Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of International Evidence.
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 8;9:238. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00238. eCollection 2019.
5
Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on socioeconomic disparities in localized and advanced prostate cancer risk.
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Oct;29(10):951-966. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1071-7. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
A Prostate Cancer Composite Score to Identify High Burden Neighborhoods.
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on disparities in prostate cancer survival.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;53:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验