Suppr超能文献

聚焦因纽特努纳武特和阿拉斯加地区的学术研究中,因纽特人定义的粮食安全决定因素:范围综述方案。

Inuit-defined determinants of food security in academic research focusing on Inuit Nunangat and Alaska: A scoping review protocol.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Nutr Health. 2023 Jun;29(2):175-183. doi: 10.1177/02601060221151091. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic research on food security in Inuit Nunangat and Alaska frequently adopts the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' working definition of food security and Western conceptualisations of what it means to be 'food secure'. However, in 2014, the Alaskan branch of the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) stated that academic and intergovernmental definitions and understandings 'are important, but not what we are talking about when we say food security'. The organisation subsequently developed its own conceptualisation and definition: the Alaskan Inuit Food Security Conceptual Framework (AIFSCF), which in 2020 received informal assent by ICC-Canada.

AIM

This protocol establishes a review strategy to examine how well academic research reflects Inuit conceptualisations and understandings of food security, as outlined in the AIFSCF.

METHODS

Review structure and reporting will be completed according to adapted RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be used to locate peer-reviewed research from Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and the Arctic and Antarctic Regions (EBSCO) databases. Dual reviewer screening will take place at the abstract, title, and full-text stages. Different study methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) will be included for review, on the proviso that articles identify drivers of food security. An coding framework will be applied by a single reviewer to extract data on publication characteristics, methods and article aims. Deductive thematic content analysis will then identify the frequency and precedence afforded within literature to the drivers and dimensions of food security identified by the AIFSCF.

摘要

背景

在因纽特努纳武特和阿拉斯加的学术研究中,经常采用联合国粮食及农业组织的粮食安全工作定义和西方对“粮食安全”的概念化理解。然而,2014 年,因纽特环极理事会(ICC)的阿拉斯加分部表示,学术和政府间的定义和理解“很重要,但这不是我们在谈论粮食安全时所指的”。该组织随后制定了自己的概念化和定义:阿拉斯加因纽特粮食安全概念框架(AIFSCF),该框架于 2020 年获得 ICC-加拿大的非正式同意。

目的

本方案旨在建立一种审查策略,以检验学术研究在多大程度上反映了 AIFSCF 中概述的因纽特人对粮食安全的概念化和理解。

方法

根据经改编的系统评价证据综合报告标准(ROSES)指南,完成审查结构和报告。将使用全面的搜索策略从 Medline、Scopus、Web of Science 和北极和南极地区(EBSCO)数据库中查找同行评审的研究。将在摘要、标题和全文阶段进行双 reviewer 筛选。将纳入不同的研究方法(定性、定量和混合方法)进行审查,前提是文章确定了粮食安全的驱动因素。将由单个 reviewer 应用编码框架提取有关出版物特征、方法和文章目的的数据。然后,演绎主题内容分析将确定文献中对 AIFSCF 确定的粮食安全驱动因素和维度的频率和优先程度。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验