• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丁丙诺啡的市场专有权对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗费用的影响。

The Impact of Suboxone's Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

机构信息

Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Dr, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):501-510. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0
PMID:36652186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10119248/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine-naloxone is an essential part of the response to opioid poisoning rates in North America. Manipulating market exclusivity is a strategy manufacturers use to increase profitability, as evidenced by Suboxone in the USA.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate excess costs of buprenorphine-naloxone due to unmerited market exclusivity (no legal patent or data protection) in Canada.

METHODS

Using controlled interrupted time-series, this study examined changes in the cost of buprenorphine-naloxone before and after the first generics were listed on public formularies. Methadone cost was the control. Public data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information in British Columbia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan were used. All buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone claims (2010-2019) accepted for payment by the provincial drug plan/programme were collected. Primary outcome was mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone after the first listing of generics.

RESULTS

Mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone before the first listing of generics was $1.21 CAD in British Columbia, $1.27 CAD in Manitoba, and $0.85 CAD in Saskatchewan. Following the introduction of generics, the cost per mg decreased by $0.22 CAD (95% CI - 0.33 to - 0.10; p = 0.0014) in British Columbia, $0.36 CAD (95% CI - 0.58 to - 0.13; p = 0.004) in Manitoba, and $0.27 CAD (95% CI - 0.50 to - 0.05; p = 0.03) in Saskatchewan. Mean cost per mg decreased by $0.26 CAD (95% CI - 0.38 to - 0.13; p = 0.0004) after a third generic was introduced in British Columbia. Excess costs to public formularies during the 4- to 5-year period prior to the listing of generics were $1,992,558 CAD in British Columbia, $80,876 CAD in Manitoba, and $4130 CAD in Saskatchewan. If buprenorphine-naloxone cost $0.61 CAD (mean cost after the third generic entered) instead of $1.21 CAD per mg during the pre-generics period, public payers in British Columbia could have saved $5,016,220 CAD between 2011 and 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

Unmerited 6 years of market exclusivity for brand-name buprenorphine-naloxone in Canada resulted in substantial excess costs. There is an urgent need to implement policies that can help reduce costs for high-priority drugs in Canada.

摘要

背景

丁丙诺啡纳洛酮是北美应对阿片类药物中毒率的重要手段。操纵市场独占权是制造商提高盈利能力的策略,美国的丁丙诺啡纳洛酮就是一个例证。

目的

研究加拿大因非正当市场独占权(无合法专利或数据保护)而导致丁丙诺啡纳洛酮的额外费用。

方法

本研究采用控制中断时间序列,在第一批仿制药上市前后,考察丁丙诺啡纳洛酮成本的变化。美沙酮成本作为对照。使用不列颠哥伦比亚省、马尼托巴省和萨斯喀彻温省加拿大卫生信息研究所的公共数据。收集了 2010 年至 2019 年期间经省级药物计划/方案接受付款的所有丁丙诺啡纳洛酮和美沙酮的索赔。主要结局是第一批仿制药上市后每毫克丁丙诺啡纳洛酮的平均成本。

结果

在第一批仿制药上市前,不列颠哥伦比亚省、马尼托巴省和萨斯喀彻温省每毫克丁丙诺啡纳洛酮的平均成本分别为 1.21 加元、1.27 加元和 0.85 加元。引入仿制药后,不列颠哥伦比亚省每毫克的成本下降了 0.22 加元(95%置信区间 -0.33 至 -0.10;p=0.0014),马尼托巴省下降了 0.36 加元(95%置信区间 -0.58 至 -0.13;p=0.004),萨斯喀彻温省下降了 0.27 加元(95%置信区间 -0.50 至 -0.05;p=0.03)。在不列颠哥伦比亚省引入第三种仿制药后,每毫克的平均成本下降了 0.26 加元(95%置信区间 -0.38 至 -0.13;p=0.0004)。在仿制药上市前的 4 至 5 年期间,公共配方的超额成本分别为不列颠哥伦比亚省 1992558 加元、马尼托巴省 80876 加元和萨斯喀彻温省 4130 加元。如果丁丙诺啡纳洛酮的成本为 0.61 加元(第三批仿制药上市后的平均成本),而不是每毫克 1.21 加元,那么不列颠哥伦比亚省的公共支付者在 2011 年至 2015 年间可能节省 5016220 加元。

结论

加拿大丁丙诺啡纳洛酮品牌 6 年非正当市场独占权导致了大量的额外费用。迫切需要实施政策,帮助降低加拿大高优先级药物的成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d59/10119248/e0fd640072be/40258_2022_787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d59/10119248/e0fd640072be/40258_2022_787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d59/10119248/e0fd640072be/40258_2022_787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Suboxone's Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.丁丙诺啡的市场专有权对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗费用的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):501-510. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Supervised dosing with a long-acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence.在阿片类药物依赖管理中使用长效阿片类药物进行监督给药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD011983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011983.pub2.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Buprenorphine/Naloxone and Methadone on Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Use Among People with Opioid Use Disorder in Canada.丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮与美沙酮对加拿大阿片类物质使用障碍患者甲基苯丙胺/苯丙胺使用情况的比较疗效
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Jul;46(3):518-530. doi: 10.1177/29767342241298044. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.丁丙诺啡维持治疗与安慰剂或美沙酮维持治疗用于阿片类物质依赖的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 6;2014(2):CD002207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4.
5
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
6
Duration of Methadone and Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment.美沙酮及丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的持续时间。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2518389. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18389.
7
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal.丁丙诺啡用于管理阿片类药物戒断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 21;2(2):CD002025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002025.pub5.
8
Trend in Prescription Medication Utilization for Opioid Use Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder From 2015 to 2021: A Population-wide Study in a Canadian Province.2015 年至 2021 年阿片类药物使用障碍和酒精使用障碍处方药物使用趋势:加拿大一省的全人群研究。
J Addict Med. 2024;18(6):683-688. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001348. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
9
Effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid use disorder: secondary analyses of prospective cohort study data.美沙酮与丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的有效性:前瞻性队列研究数据的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e095645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095645.
10
Association between prescribed stimulant medications and overdose among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy: A retrospective cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.接受阿片类激动剂治疗的个体中,处方兴奋剂药物与药物过量之间的关联:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的一项回顾性队列研究。
Addiction. 2025 Jun;120(6):1184-1194. doi: 10.1111/add.16760. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators of and barriers to buprenorphine initiation in the emergency department: a scoping review.急诊科丁丙诺啡起始治疗的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Sep 28;38:100899. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100899. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.1995 年至 2010 年期间获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物的新配方的批准和时间,并跟踪到 2021 年。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221096. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1096. eCollection 2022 May.
2
How the Suboxone Education Programme presented as a solution to risks in the Canadian opioid crisis: a critical discourse analysis.《Suboxone 教育计划如何被呈现为解决加拿大阿片类药物危机中的风险的一种方案:批判性话语分析》。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e059561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059561.
3
Permissive regulation: A critical review of the regulatory history of buprenorphine formulations in Canada.
宽容监管:加拿大丁丙诺啡制剂监管历史的批判性回顾。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jul;105:103749. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103749. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):336-344. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17012.
5
Factors Affecting Buprenorphine Utilization and Spending in Medicaid, 2002-2018.影响医疗补助计划中丁丙诺啡使用和支出的因素,2002-2018 年。
Value Health. 2021 Feb;24(2):182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1840. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
The Impact of Tiered-Pricing Framework on Generic Entry in Canada.分层定价框架对加拿大仿制药进入市场的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jun 1;11(6):768-776. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.215.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: a Rapid Review.阿片类物质使用障碍药物治疗的障碍与促进因素:快速综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(Suppl 3):954-963. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06257-4. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
8
Generic Drug Policy and Suboxone to Treat Opioid Use Disorder.仿制药政策与苏肽生治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;47(4_suppl):43-53. doi: 10.1177/1073110519898042.
9
Lost cost savings to the NHS in England due to the delayed entry of multiple generic low-dose transdermal buprenorphine: a case scenario analysis.由于多种通用低剂量透皮丁丙诺啡延迟进入市场,导致英国国民保健服务体系(NHS)的成本节约损失:案例情景分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e026817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026817.
10
Buprenorphine Deregulation and Mainstreaming Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: X the X Waiver.丁丙诺啡管制放松与阿片类物质使用障碍的主流治疗:X豁免权。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):229-230. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3685.