Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Stop A8000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1452-1460. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02649-2. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Working memory is a vital, but capacity-limited, cognitive instrument that requires frequent updating as our goals and environment change. Individuals diagnosed with depression have a reduced capacity compared with the general population, as they have a propensity to fixate on negative information, even when it is not relevant for the task at hand. Here we investigated how characteristics of psychiatric illnesses, such as rumination, affect a person's ability to efficiently update emotional information in mind. We used both neutral and negative pictures of scenes in a working memory updating task that required participants to occasionally replace items held in mind during a brief delay period. Participants were presented with a probe item at the end of each trial and asked to report whether that item was in their current memory set. Responses were slowest and least accurate for images that had been replaced (i.e., "lures"), indicating there was some difficulty in successfully updating working memory in this paradigm. Participants who have both a high propensity to ruminate and a low working memory capacity were significantly more likely to false alarm to these lures. While emotional valence did not impact accuracy for these participants, their false alarms were faster for negative stimuli compared with neutral stimuli, indicating that task-irrelevant emotional information was more difficult to remove from working memory. These results demonstrate how rumination impairs goal-directed behavior by obscuring the boundary between relevant and irrelevant information in working memory.
工作记忆是一种至关重要但容量有限的认知工具,随着我们的目标和环境的变化,需要频繁更新。与一般人群相比,被诊断患有抑郁症的个体的工作记忆容量减少,因为他们倾向于专注于负面信息,即使这些信息与手头的任务无关。在这里,我们研究了精神疾病的特征(如反刍)如何影响一个人有效地更新头脑中情绪信息的能力。我们在工作记忆更新任务中使用了中性和负性场景的图片,该任务要求参与者在短暂的延迟期间偶尔替换记忆中的项目。在每个试验结束时,参与者都会收到一个探测项,并被要求报告该项目是否在他们当前的记忆集中。对于已经替换的图像(即“诱饵”),反应最慢且最不准确,这表明在这种范式中成功更新工作记忆存在一些困难。那些既有强烈反刍倾向又有低工作记忆容量的参与者更有可能对这些诱饵产生错误警报。虽然情绪效价对这些参与者的准确性没有影响,但他们对负性刺激的错误警报比中性刺激更快,这表明与任务无关的情绪信息更难从工作记忆中消除。这些结果表明,反刍如何通过模糊工作记忆中相关和不相关信息之间的边界来损害目标导向行为。