Schiavone Nicola, Verney Vincent, Askanian Haroutioun
Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, ICCF, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
3D Print Addit Manuf. 2020 Dec 1;7(6):311-325. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2020.0175. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
This article presents the effect analysis of the printing time sequences on the mechanical properties in correlation with the crystallization kinetics and rheological behavior. For this purpose, two printing order of 3D printed samples (printed simultaneously or in sequence) were chosen. In addition, two different infill patterns (line and gyroid) and building directions (horizontal and vertical) have been used. Concerning the polymer filaments, two commercial polylactic acid (PLA 3D870 and PLA 3D850) having different crystallization kinetics were used. The effect of the printing time delay between each layer on the temperature profile and the crystallization evolution was studied using a finite element analysis method simulation. The simulation results show a greater thermal excursion for longer delay times between the layers and with a crystallization degree evolution characterized by a step pattern. Moreover, a major density of crystals appears in the center of the final part. A new approach was adapted to measure the volumetric contraction of the material as a function of the temperature; it was performed with a gap test using a rotational rheometer under static conditions (without external deformation). The normal force measured from the test has shown a faster and higher increase of the contraction for the material with faster crystallization kinetics and with a higher degree of crystallinity. The results concerning the tensile properties show better rigidity for the samples printed in sequence due to the minor time of delay between the deposited layers. The mesostructure of the printed parts was analyzed with an X-ray tomography and a scanning electron microscope. The highest difference is presented from the PLA 3D870 characterized by the highest rate of crystallization resulting in more microvoids compared with the PLA 3D850, due to the less welding cohesion between the layers.
本文介绍了打印时间序列对机械性能的影响分析,并将其与结晶动力学和流变行为相关联。为此,选择了两种3D打印样品的打印顺序(同时打印或依次打印)。此外,还使用了两种不同的填充图案(直线和螺旋状)以及构建方向(水平和垂直)。关于聚合物长丝,使用了两种具有不同结晶动力学的商业聚乳酸(PLA 3D870和PLA 3D850)。采用有限元分析方法模拟研究了各层之间打印时间延迟对温度分布和结晶演变的影响。模拟结果表明,层间延迟时间越长,热偏移越大,结晶度演变呈现阶梯状。此外,在最终部件的中心出现了主要的晶体密度。采用一种新方法来测量材料的体积收缩随温度的变化;该方法是在静态条件下(无外部变形)使用旋转流变仪进行间隙测试来完成的。从测试中测得的法向力表明,结晶动力学较快且结晶度较高的材料收缩增加更快、更高。关于拉伸性能的结果表明,依次打印的样品具有更好的刚性,这是因为沉积层之间的延迟时间较短。使用X射线断层扫描和扫描电子显微镜对打印部件的细观结构进行了分析。PLA 3D870的结晶速率最高,与PLA 3D850相比,由于层间焊接结合力较小,导致更多的微孔,差异最为明显。