• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭参与以加强资源有限医院的护理和应对卫生工作者短缺:系统评价。

Family participation to enhance care and tackle health worker shortages in resource-limited hospitals: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Infectious disease, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2023 Jan 20;13:04005. doi: 10.7189/13.04005.

DOI:10.7189/13.04005
PMID:36655879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9853090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing global shortage of health workers is limiting access to health care, especially in resource-limited countries. Family participation in hospital care could enhance care while tackling health worker shortages. With the same resources, it might deliver additional and more personalised care. This review assessed the effect and safety of family participation interventions in the care of hospitalised adults in resource-limited settings and, ultimately, if it is a viable strategy to tackle health worker shortages.

METHODS

For this systematic review, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Global Health Library were searched from inception till April 7, 2022. Clinical studies were included if they described a family participation intervention for hospitalised adults, were performed in a low- or middle-income country and reported on a patient-related outcome. Data were collected on patient, family, staff and health service-related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROB2 and ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

From 4444 studies, six were included for narrative synthesis, with a total of 1794 participants. Four studies were performed in Asia and two in Africa; all were published between 2017 and 2022. In-hospital family participation interventions aimed at medication administration and adherence, delirium prevention, and palliative cancer care were successful in significantly improving patient outcomes. Involving family in post-stroke rehabilitation interventions showed no significant effect on mortality and long-term disability. Few data were reported on participating family members' outcomes or hospital staffing issues. None of the included studies showed harm from family participation.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited data suggest that family participation can be effective and safe in specific contexts. However, more research is needed to determine the effect of family participation and justify further implementation. Family participation research for enhancing care while tackling health worker shortages should be a collaborative priority of researchers, health care professionals, funding agencies and policymakers.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration No. CRD42020205878.

摘要

背景

全球卫生工作者短缺日益严重,限制了医疗保健的可及性,尤其是在资源有限的国家。家庭成员参与医院护理可以在解决卫生工作者短缺问题的同时提高护理质量。利用相同的资源,可能会提供更多个性化的护理。本综述评估了在资源有限的环境中,家庭成员参与住院成人护理的干预措施的效果和安全性,以及它是否是解决卫生工作者短缺问题的可行策略。

方法

本系统综述检索了 Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和全球卫生图书馆,检索时间从建库开始至 2022 年 4 月 7 日。如果研究描述了针对住院成人的家庭参与干预措施,且在中低收入国家进行,并报告了与患者相关的结局,则纳入临床研究。研究收集了患者、家庭、医护人员和卫生服务相关结局的数据。使用 ROB2 和 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

从 4444 篇研究中,有 6 篇研究进行了叙述性综合分析,共纳入 1794 名参与者。4 项研究在亚洲进行,2 项在非洲进行;所有研究均在 2017 年至 2022 年期间发表。旨在改善药物管理和依从性、预防谵妄和姑息治疗癌症的住院期间家庭参与干预措施,显著改善了患者结局。参与中风后康复干预的家庭对死亡率和长期残疾没有显著影响。关于参与家庭的结局或医院人员配备问题的数据很少。纳入的研究均未显示家庭参与存在危害。

结论

有限的数据表明,在特定情况下,家庭参与可能是有效和安全的。然而,还需要更多的研究来确定家庭参与的效果,并证明进一步实施的合理性。在解决卫生工作者短缺问题的同时,提高护理质量,应成为研究人员、医疗保健专业人员、资助机构和政策制定者的协作重点。

注册

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020205878。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508a/9853090/485e8f94c4d2/jogh-13-04005-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508a/9853090/485e8f94c4d2/jogh-13-04005-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508a/9853090/485e8f94c4d2/jogh-13-04005-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Family participation to enhance care and tackle health worker shortages in resource-limited hospitals: A systematic review.家庭参与以加强资源有限医院的护理和应对卫生工作者短缺:系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2023 Jan 20;13:04005. doi: 10.7189/13.04005.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
4
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Missed nursing care in acute care hospital settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家急性护理医院环境中的护理缺失:系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00807-7.
10
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing the IMPALA continuous monitoring system for paediatric critical care in Malawi: A mixed methods study of barriers and facilitators.在马拉维实施用于儿科重症监护的IMPALA连续监测系统:关于障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329265. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the Quality of Delirium Website Content for Patient and Family Education: Cross-Sectional Study.用于患者及家属教育的谵妄网站内容质量评估:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 20;27:e53087. doi: 10.2196/53087.
3
"A Person Taking Care of the Sick is also a Sick Person": Challenges and Consequences of Hospital-Based Informal Caregiving.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregiver Engagement Enhances Outcomes Among Randomized Control Trials of Transitional Care Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.照顾者参与增强了过渡期护理干预随机对照试验的结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Care. 2022 Jul 1;60(7):519-529. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001728. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Prevalence and determinants of stress of informal caregiving: A cross-sectional study among informal caregivers of hospitalised patients in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.非正规照护者的压力现状及其决定因素:尼日利亚一家三级医院住院患者非正规照护者的横断面研究。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2022 Jan-Mar;29(1):20-28. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_700_21.
3
“照顾病人的人也是病人”:基于医院的非正式护理的挑战和后果。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241302005. doi: 10.1177/00469580241302005.
4
The barriers and facilitators family caregivers experience when participating in resource-limited hospital care: a qualitative systematic review.资源有限的医院照护中,家庭照护者所经历的障碍和促进因素:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 13;9(11):e015956. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015956.
5
Understanding patient and family experiences of critical care in Bangladesh and India: What are the priority actions to promote person-centred care?了解孟加拉国和印度重症监护患者及其家属的经历:促进以患者为中心的护理的优先行动有哪些?
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;4(6):e0003372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003372. eCollection 2024.
6
The role of healthcare providers and caregivers in monitoring critically ill children: a qualitative study in a tertiary hospital, southern Malawi.医疗保健提供者和护理人员在监测危重症儿童中的作用:马拉维南部一家三级医院的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11050-8.
7
Effective analysis of job satisfaction among medical staff in Chinese public hospitals: a random forest model.中国公立医院医务人员工作满意度的有效分析:随机森林模型
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1357709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357709. eCollection 2024.
8
The effect of family-centered care on unplanned emergency room visits, hospital readmissions and intensive care admissions after surgery: a root cause analysis from a prospective multicenter study in the Netherlands.以家庭为中心的护理对手术后非计划性急诊就诊、医院再入院和重症监护入院的影响:来自荷兰一项前瞻性多中心研究的根本原因分析
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Apr 30;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00399-8.
Standardization of caregiver and nursing perioperative care on gynecologic oncology wards in a resource-limited setting.
资源有限环境下妇科肿瘤病房护理人员围手术期护理的标准化
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Dec 21;39:100915. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100915. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Understanding context: A qualitative analysis of the roles of family caregivers of people living with cancer in Vietnam and the implications for service development in low-income settings.理解语境:对越南癌症患者的家庭照顾者的角色的定性分析及其对低收入环境下服务发展的启示。
Psychooncology. 2021 Oct;30(10):1782-1788. doi: 10.1002/pon.5746. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
5
The Scope of Family-Centred Care Practices, and the Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Family-Centred Care for Hospitalised Children and their Families in Developing Countries: An Integrative Review.家庭为中心的护理实践的范围,以及在发展中国家为住院儿童及其家庭实施家庭为中心的护理的促进因素和障碍:综合评价。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;55:10-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments.风险偏倚可视化 (robvis):一个用于可视化风险偏倚评估的 R 包和 Shiny 网络应用程序。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Family participation in the care of older adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A scoping review.家庭参与老年重症监护病房患者护理:范围综述。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):474-484. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Effect of the Tailored, Family-Involved Hospital Elder Life Program on Postoperative Delirium and Function in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.个体化家庭参与式医院老年关怀方案对老年患者术后谵妄及功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):17-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4446.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
Active involvement of family members in postoperative care after esophageal or pancreatic resection: A feasibility study.家庭成员积极参与食管或胰腺切除术后的术后护理:一项可行性研究。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):769-777. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.032. Epub 2019 Jul 6.