Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cognitive Systems Lab, Mathematics & Computer Science, Bremen University, Bremen, Germany.
Exp Psychol. 2022 Sep;69(5):253-266. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000562.
Mood has been argued to impact the breadth of human attention, but the empirical evidence supporting this claim remains shaky. Gable and Harmon-Jones (2008) have attributed previous empirical inconsistencies regarding the effect of mood on attentional breath to a critical role of approach/avoidance motivation. They demonstrated that the combination of positive affect with high, but not with low, motivational intensity improves performance during processing local information and impairs performance during processing global information. The latter, but not the former, was replicated by Domachowska et al. (2016). Since we were interested in the modulation of attention by valence and motivation, and considering the inconsistencies in the findings, we replicated the critical experiments of both studies in four online experiments but found no significant effect of either valence or motivational intensity on attention. Taken together, our evidence casts doubt on a systematic relationship between mood or motivation on the one hand and global/local processing on the other.
情绪被认为会影响人类注意力的广度,但支持这一说法的经验证据仍然很薄弱。Gable 和 Harmon-Jones(2008)将先前关于情绪对注意力广度影响的经验不一致归因于趋近/回避动机的关键作用。他们表明,积极情绪与高但不是低动机强度的结合可以提高处理局部信息的表现,而降低处理全局信息的表现。后者,但不是前者,被 Domachowska 等人复制。(2016)。由于我们对注意力的调制感兴趣,并且考虑到发现的不一致性,我们在四个在线实验中复制了这两项研究的关键实验,但没有发现效价或动机强度对注意力的显著影响。综上所述,我们的证据对情绪或动机与全局/局部处理之间的系统关系提出了质疑。