• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终关怀社会工作者对提供 Facebook 支持小组的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Hospice Social Work Preferences for the Delivery of Facebook Support Groups: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, Goldfarb School of Nursing, St Louis, MO, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;40(12):1339-1348. doi: 10.1177/10499091231152442. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1177/10499091231152442
PMID:36658463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354212/
Abstract

Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions is best accomplished with input from stakeholders. This project used a Discrete Choice Experiment to determine the preferences of a nationwide sample of hospice social workers toward the most preferred way to scale the delivery of an online support group. While the majority of social workers preferred referring caregivers to online support groups facilitated outside their agency rather than to facilitate groups themselves, the results were not statistically significant. Social workers reported concerns with both options. Further work with stakeholders is needed to develop implementation strategies and determine the feasibility of both options.

摘要

证据为基础的干预措施的传播和实施最好能得到利益相关者的投入。本项目使用离散选择实验来确定全国范围内的临终关怀社会工作者对扩大在线支持小组提供方式的最偏好方式的偏好。虽然大多数社会工作者更倾向于将照顾者转介给其机构之外的人来协助管理在线支持小组,而不是自己来管理,但结果没有统计学意义。社会工作者对这两种选择都表示担忧。需要与利益相关者进一步合作,以制定实施策略并确定这两种选择的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da6/10354212/2460b1bc19bf/nihms-1865675-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da6/10354212/2460b1bc19bf/nihms-1865675-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da6/10354212/2460b1bc19bf/nihms-1865675-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospice Social Work Preferences for the Delivery of Facebook Support Groups: A Discrete Choice Experiment.临终关怀社会工作者对提供 Facebook 支持小组的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Dec;40(12):1339-1348. doi: 10.1177/10499091231152442. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Facebook Online Support Groups for Hospice Family Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients: Protocol, Facilitation Skills and Promising Outcomes.脸书在线支持小组为晚期癌症患者的临终关怀家庭护理员提供支持:方案、促进技能和有希望的结果。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):146-159. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2022.2046236. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
"It is the 'starting over' part that is so hard": Using an online group to support hospice bereavement.“正是‘重新开始’这部分如此艰难”:利用在线群组支持临终关怀中的丧亲之痛。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Apr;13(2):351-7. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001235. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
4
Lessons learned from a secret Facebook support group.从一个脸书私密支持小组中吸取的经验教训。
Health Soc Work. 2015 May;40(2):125-33. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlv007.
5
A survey of hospice day services in the United Kingdom & Republic of Ireland : how did hospices offer social support to palliative care patients, pre-pandemic?英国和爱尔兰的临终关怀日服务调查:大流行前,临终关怀机构如何为姑息治疗患者提供社会支持?
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 5;21(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01061-9.
6
Exploring the Lived Experiences of Rural Hospice Social Workers in Navigating "Cracked" Systems.探索农村临终关怀社会工作者在应对“破裂”系统时的真实体验。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2024 Jan-Mar;20(1):26-47. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2262154. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Psychosocial Assessment by Hospice Social Workers: A Content Review of Instruments From a National Sample.临终关怀社会工作者的心理社会评估:来自全国样本的工具内容综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jan;53(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
8
Caregiver Speaks Study Protocol: A Technologically-Mediated Storytelling Intervention for Hospice Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia.照顾者讲述研究方案:一项针对痴呆症患者临终关怀家庭照顾者的技术介导叙事干预。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Apr;38(4):376-382. doi: 10.1177/1049909120960449. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
The Social Convoy for Family Caregivers Over the Course of Hospice.临终关怀过程中家庭照顾者的社会支持群体
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
10
The burden in palliative care assistance: A comparison of psychosocial risks and burnout between inpatient hospice and home care services workers.姑息治疗援助中的负担:住院临终关怀与家庭护理服务工作者的心理社会风险和职业倦怠比较
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):49-56. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001887.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared Decision Making (ACCESS) intervention: a cluster cross-over randomised clinical trial.癌症护理人员参与共同决策的教育与支持(ACCESS)干预措施:一项整群交叉随机临床试验。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 2. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004100.
2
Characterizing Participant Perceptions about Smoking-Cessation Pharmacotherapy and E-Cigarettes from Facebook Smoking-Cessation Support Groups.从 Facebook 戒烟支持群组中描绘参与者对戒烟药物治疗和电子烟的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127314.
3
Tracking the nature and trajectory of social support in Facebook mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
追踪新冠疫情期间脸书互助群组中社会支持的性质与轨迹。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jun 15;76:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103043. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Perspectives of State Association Leaders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间州协会领导人的观点
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;40(1):61-66. doi: 10.1177/10499091221090224. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
The Effect of Digital Literacy on Participation in Social Media Clinical Trials in Cancer: Tailoring an Informed Consent Process.数字素养对癌症患者参与社交媒体临床试验的影响:定制知情同意流程。
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Mar 21;28(11):1682-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0555.
6
Facebook Online Support Groups for Hospice Family Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients: Protocol, Facilitation Skills and Promising Outcomes.脸书在线支持小组为晚期癌症患者的临终关怀家庭护理员提供支持:方案、促进技能和有希望的结果。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):146-159. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2022.2046236. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
7
Facebook Support Groups for Pediatric Rare Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study to Investigate Opportunities, Limitations, and Privacy Concerns.儿科罕见病的脸书支持小组:一项横断面研究,旨在调查其机遇、局限性及隐私问题
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):e31411. doi: 10.2196/31411.
8
Family Caregiver Problems in Outpatient Palliative Oncology.门诊姑息肿瘤学中的家庭照料者问题。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;24(7):1056-1060. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0010. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.离散选择实验:模型设定、估计与软件指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
10
The Effect of Internet Group Support for Caregivers on Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Caregiver Burden: A Meta-Analysis.互联网支持团体对照顾者的社会支持、自我效能和照顾者负担的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):621-629. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Feb 28.