McLauchlan G, Rawlings J M, Lucas M L, McCloy R F, Crean G P, McColl K E
Gastrointestinal Centre, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow.
Gut. 1987 Aug;28(8):935-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.8.935.
Three pH electrodes in clinical use were examined--(1) antimony electrode with remote reference electrode (Synectics 0011), (2) glass electrode with remote reference electrode (Microelectrodes Inc. MI 506) and (3) combined glass electrode with integral reference electrode (Radiometer GK2801C). In vitro studies showed that both glass electrodes were similar and superior to the antimony electrode with respect to response time, drift, and sensitivity. The effect of the siting of the reference electrode on the recorded pH was examined in five human volunteers. The pH reading using a remote skin reference electrode was higher by a mean of 0.3 pH units (range 0.0-0.6) in the stomach, lower by 0.65 pH units (0.5-0.8) in the duodenum and lower by 0.3 pH units (0.0-0.6) in the oesophagus than that simultaneously obtained with an intraluminal reference electrode. Buccal reference electrodes gave similar readings to skin. Combined reference and glass pH electrodes are recommended for 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring.
对临床使用的三种pH电极进行了检测——(1)带有远程参比电极的锑电极(Synectics 0011),(2)带有远程参比电极的玻璃电极(Microelectrodes公司MI 506),以及(3)带有一体式参比电极的复合玻璃电极(Radiometer GK2801C)。体外研究表明,在响应时间、漂移和灵敏度方面,两种玻璃电极相似且优于锑电极。在五名人类志愿者身上检测了参比电极位置对记录的pH值的影响。使用远程皮肤参比电极测得的pH值,在胃中平均比同时使用腔内参比电极测得的高0.3个pH单位(范围为0.0 - 0.6),在十二指肠中低0.65个pH单位(0.5 - 0.8),在食管中低0.3个pH单位(0.0 - 0.6)。口腔参比电极测得的读数与皮肤参比电极相似。推荐使用复合参比和玻璃pH电极进行24小时动态pH监测。