Li Xuelin, Wang Yu, Bai Wenbin, Zhang Qiuyue, Zhao Leicheng, Cheng Zhipeng, Zhu Hongkai, Sun Hongwen
MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Toxics. 2023 Jan 6;11(1):58. doi: 10.3390/toxics11010058.
Novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) have been widely used as alternatives to legacy BFRs. However, information on the contamination status and human exposure risks of electronic waste (e-waste)-derived NBFRs in the e-waste workplace is limited. In this study, six NBFRs and the legacy BFRs, hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs), were analyzed in 50 dust samples from an e-waste-dismantling workplace in Central China. The dust concentration of NBFRs in e-waste-dismantling workshops (median, 157−169 ng/g) was found to be significantly higher than those in an outdoor environment (17.3 ng/g) (p < 0.01). Differently, the highest median concentration of HBCDs was found in dust from the dismantling workshop for cellphones and computers (367 ng/g) among studied areas. The bis(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-phthalate (BEHTBP) was the predominant compound, which contributed 66.0−88.0% of measured NBFR concentrations. NBFRs might originate from plastic and rubber materials in wastes based on the correlation and principal component analysis. Moreover, the total estimated daily intakes (average scenario) of NBFRs were calculated at 2.64 × 10−2 ng/kg bw/d and 2.91× 10−2 ng/kg bw/d for the male and female dismantling workers, respectively, via dust ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact pathways, which were lower than the reference dose values, and thus indicated a limited human exposure risk for NBFRs at the current level. Although the dust concentrations and daily intakes of NBFRs were still lower than those of other emerging pollutants (e.g., organophosphate and nitrogenous flame retardants) measured in the same sampling set, the elevated levels of NBFRs suggested the progressive BFR replacement process in China, which deserves more attention regarding their adverse effects on both the environment and human health.
新型溴化阻燃剂(NBFRs)已被广泛用作传统溴化阻燃剂的替代品。然而,关于电子垃圾(电子废弃物)拆解工作场所中源自电子垃圾的NBFRs的污染状况和人体暴露风险的信息有限。在本研究中,对来自中国中部一个电子废弃物拆解工作场所的50份灰尘样本中的6种NBFRs以及传统溴化阻燃剂六溴环十二烷(HBCDs)进行了分析。发现电子废弃物拆解车间中NBFRs的灰尘浓度(中位数为157 - 169纳克/克)显著高于室外环境(17.3纳克/克)(p < 0.01)。不同的是,在所研究的区域中,手机和电脑拆解车间的灰尘中HBCDs的中位数浓度最高(367纳克/克)。双(2-乙基己基)-3,4,5,6-四溴邻苯二甲酸酯(BEHTBP)是主要化合物,占所测NBFRs浓度的66.0 - 88.0%。基于相关性和主成分分析,NBFRs可能源自废弃物中的塑料和橡胶材料。此外,通过灰尘摄入、吸入和皮肤接触途径计算得出,男性和女性拆解工人的NBFRs每日总估计摄入量(平均情况)分别为2.64×10−2纳克/千克体重/天和2.91×10−2纳克/千克体重/天,低于参考剂量值,因此表明当前水平下NBFRs对人体的暴露风险有限。尽管NBFRs的灰尘浓度和每日摄入量仍低于在同一采样组中测得的其他新兴污染物(如有机磷酸酯和含氮阻燃剂),但NBFRs水平的升高表明中国溴化阻燃剂的逐步替代过程,这在其对环境和人体健康的不利影响方面值得更多关注。