Achararit Paniti, Manaspon Chawan, Jongwannasiri Chavin, Phattarataratip Ekarat, Osathanon Thanaphum, Sappayatosok Kraisorn
Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Biomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):1275-1282. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760300. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
The aim of this study was to employ artificial intelligence (AI) via convolutional neural network (CNN) for the separation of oral lichen planus (OLP) and non-OLP in biopsy-proven clinical cases of OLP and non-OLP.
Data comprised of clinical photographs of 609 OLP and 480 non-OLP which diagnosis has been confirmed histopathologically. Fifty-five photographs from the OLP and non-OLP groups were randomly selected for use as the test dataset, while the remaining were used as training and validation datasets. Data augmentation was performed on the training dataset to increase the number and variation of photographs. Performance metrics for the CNN model performance included accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping was also used to visualize the important regions associated with discriminative clinical features on which the model relies.
All the selected CNN models were able to diagnose OLP and non-OLP lesions using photographs. The performance of the Xception model was significantly higher than that of the other models in terms of overall accuracy and F1-score.
Our demonstration shows that CNN models can achieve an accuracy of 82 to 88%. Xception model performed the best in terms of both accuracy and F1-score.
本研究旨在通过卷积神经网络(CNN)利用人工智能(AI)对经活检证实的口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)和非OLP临床病例进行OLP与非OLP的区分。
数据包括609例OLP和480例非OLP的临床照片,其诊断已通过组织病理学证实。从OLP组和非OLP组中随机选择55张照片用作测试数据集,其余用作训练和验证数据集。对训练数据集进行数据增强以增加照片的数量和变化。CNN模型性能的评估指标包括准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、灵敏度、特异度和F1分数。还使用梯度加权类激活映射来可视化与模型所依赖的鉴别性临床特征相关的重要区域。
所有选定的CNN模型都能够使用照片诊断OLP和非OLP病变。就总体准确率和F1分数而言,Xception模型的性能显著高于其他模型。
我们的论证表明,CNN模型可以达到82%至88%的准确率。Xception模型在准确率和F1分数方面表现最佳。