• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于性少数群体(LGBTQ+)人群的阴茎假体植入后伴侣满意度的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Partner Satisfaction After Penile Prosthesis with Special Emphasis on LGBTQ + Populations.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Feb;24(2):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01126-5. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11934-022-01126-5
PMID:36670232
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the current surgical advances and patients' satisfactions after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation, there has been paucity of data on reported partner satisfaction and their quality-of-life (QoL). Our objective was to summarize the current literature on partner satisfaction for both heterosexual and non-heterosexual populations, respectively. We specifically conducted a systematic review according to the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, and stratified studies into three tiers by methodological rigor.

RECENT FINDINGS

After an initial search of 172 articles, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria for the final review: 30 for heterosexual partner satisfaction, and 3 for LGBTQ patient satisfaction were included due to lack of published literature on partner satisfaction for LGBTQ patients. For heterosexual partner satisfaction, 10 studies were classified as Tier 1, 11 studies were classified as Tier 2, and 9 studies were classified as Tier 3. From an initial search of 13 records, three studies consisting of 272 patients met the inclusion criteria for our LGBTQ review. Across all the tiers, studies noted satisfaction rates between 50 and 90% and improved satisfaction and sexual QoL metrics compared to pre-surgery rates. That said, partner satisfaction rates were also consistently lower than patient satisfaction rates. Although the range of evidence quality varies, the available literature suggests significant improvements in and relatively high rates of partner satisfaction after PP implantation. Given the diversity of study designs and widespread use of non-validated or non-specific questionnaires in the current literature, future research should focus on prospective studies and/or data collection using validated, PP-specific questionnaires.

摘要

目的综述

尽管目前阴茎假体(PP)植入术后手术技术取得了进步,患者满意度也较高,但有关报告中伴侣满意度及其生活质量(QoL)的数据却很少。我们的目的是分别总结异性恋和非异性恋人群中伴侣满意度的现有文献。我们根据 Cochrane 和系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准进行了系统综述,并根据方法学严谨性将研究分为三个层次。

最近的发现

经过初步搜索 172 篇文章,33 项研究符合最终综述的纳入标准:30 项为异性恋伴侣满意度研究,3 项为 LGBTQ 患者满意度研究,因为缺乏 LGBTQ 患者伴侣满意度的已发表文献。对于异性恋伴侣满意度,10 项研究被归类为 1 级,11 项研究被归类为 2 级,9 项研究被归类为 3 级。从最初搜索的 13 份记录中,有 3 项研究包括 272 名患者,符合我们的 LGBTQ 综述纳入标准。在所有层次中,研究报告的满意度率在 50%至 90%之间,与术前相比,满意度和性 QoL 指标有所提高。也就是说,伴侣满意度也始终低于患者满意度。尽管证据质量的范围有所不同,但现有文献表明,PP 植入后伴侣满意度显著提高,且相对较高。鉴于研究设计的多样性以及当前文献中广泛使用非验证或非特定的问卷,未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性研究和/或使用经过验证的、特定于 PP 的问卷进行数据收集。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Partner Satisfaction After Penile Prosthesis with Special Emphasis on LGBTQ + Populations.基于性少数群体(LGBTQ+)人群的阴茎假体植入后伴侣满意度的系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Feb;24(2):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01126-5. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
2
Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.阴茎假体手术:性医学国际咨询会议的当前建议
J Sex Med. 2016 Apr;13(4):489-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
3
A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者阴茎假体植入的系统评价。
Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Penile Prosthesis Implantation Combined With Grafting Techniques in Patients With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.阴茎假体植入联合移植物技术在伴勃起功能障碍的 Peyronie 病患者中的应用:一项系统评价。
Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):451-459. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review of Independent Treatment Methods for ED: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Diet, Supplements, Pharmacotherapy, and Physiotherapy.勃起功能障碍独立治疗方法的叙述性综述:饮食、补充剂、药物治疗和物理治疗的有效性评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 31;14(7):2386. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072386.