• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创新行为中的知识共享能力:研究生视角的 SEM 研究

The Knowledge Sharing Capability in Innovative Behavior: A SEM Approach from Graduate Students' Insights.

机构信息

Institute of Concrete Science and Technology (ICITECH), Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021284.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021284
PMID:36674040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9858868/
Abstract

The capability to share knowledge is considered one of the most relevant components of knowledge management. Moreover, there is little empirical evidence indicating how future human resources in the construction industry value the richness of knowledge sharing and the richness of their innovative behavior. The purposes of this study are (1) to determine which facilitators, from the point of view of master's degree students related to engineering and construction management in Spain, most substantially influence knowledge sharing capability; (2) to test whether knowledge sharing capability (KS) positively influences innovative behavior (IB); and (3) demonstrating whether organizational innovation climate (OIC) is a factor that moderates the relationship between KS and IB. In this research, we have proposed a theoretical model and empirically tested the model in a sample of 253 master's degree students in public universities in Spain. The findings support the proposed model, and the structural equation modeling (SEM) evaluation suggests that, among all the facilitators of KS, information and communication technologies (ICT) stand out among the other facilitators and have a more significant influence on KS. Furthermore, the research found a direct correlation between KS and IB and causal links between OIC and IB.

摘要

知识共享能力被认为是知识管理中最重要的组成部分之一。此外,很少有实证证据表明建筑行业未来的人力资源如何重视知识共享的丰富性和创新行为的丰富性。本研究的目的是:(1)确定从西班牙工程和建筑管理硕士研究生的角度来看,哪些促进因素对知识共享能力有实质性的影响;(2)检验知识共享能力(KS)是否对创新行为(IB)有积极影响;(3)证明组织创新氛围(OIC)是否是调节 KS 和 IB 关系的因素。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个理论模型,并在西班牙公立大学的 253 名硕士研究生样本中对该模型进行了实证检验。研究结果支持了所提出的模型,结构方程模型(SEM)评估表明,在所有 KS 的促进因素中,信息和通信技术(ICT)在其他促进因素中脱颖而出,对 KS 有更显著的影响。此外,研究发现 KS 和 IB 之间存在直接相关性,以及 OIC 和 IB 之间存在因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/9858868/0deb62e10819/ijerph-20-01284-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/9858868/71b12dfbd4fd/ijerph-20-01284-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/9858868/0deb62e10819/ijerph-20-01284-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/9858868/71b12dfbd4fd/ijerph-20-01284-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/9858868/0deb62e10819/ijerph-20-01284-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Knowledge Sharing Capability in Innovative Behavior: A SEM Approach from Graduate Students' Insights.创新行为中的知识共享能力:研究生视角的 SEM 研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021284.
2
Innovative work behavior in high-tech enterprises: Chain intermediary effect of psychological safety and knowledge sharing.高科技企业中的创新工作行为:心理安全与知识共享的链式中介效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 24;13:1017121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017121. eCollection 2022.
3
Artificial Intelligence Capability and Organizational Creativity: The Role of Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Cohesion.人工智能能力与组织创造力:知识共享和组织凝聚力的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:845277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845277. eCollection 2022.
4
SWOT analysis to evaluate the programme of a joint online/onsite master's degree in environmental education through the students' perceptions.通过学生的看法进行SWOT分析,以评估环境教育联合在线/现场硕士学位项目。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Feb;54:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Scientific creativity and innovation ability and its determinants among medical postgraduate students in Fujian province of China: a cross sectional study.中国福建省医学生研究生的科学创造力和创新能力及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04408-9.
6
The Influence of Personal Motivation and Innovative Climate on Innovative Behavior: Evidence from University Students in China.个人动机与创新氛围对创新行为的影响:来自中国大学生的证据。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Aug 24;15:2343-2355. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S381494. eCollection 2022.
7
A study on the effects of college students' knowledge-sharing behavior on group performance and individual social status.一项关于大学生知识共享行为对团队绩效和个人社会地位影响的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1172554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172554. eCollection 2023.
8
Graduate Students' Perceived Supervisor Support and Innovative Behavior in Research: The Mediation Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy.研究生对导师支持的感知与研究中的创新行为:创造性自我效能感的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 17;13:875266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875266. eCollection 2022.
9
Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Creativity: The Key Factors in Nurses' Innovative Behaviors.领导力、知识共享与创造力:护士创新行为的关键因素。
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Dec;45(12):615-21. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000274.
10
Blended knowledge sharing model in design professional.设计专业中的混合式知识分享模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 28;13(1):16326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43505-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Organizational Innovation Climate on Employee Innovative Behavior: The Role of Psychological Ownership and Task Interdependence.组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响:心理所有权和任务相互依赖的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:856407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856407. eCollection 2022.
2
Research on the Initiative Scientific Research and Innovation Behavior of Postgraduates: Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.基于计划行为理论的研究生主动性科研创新行为研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:839981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.839981. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review.
使用多元回归评估分类变量调节效应时的效应量与检验效能:30年回顾
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94.