Suppr超能文献

对比石板安全可穿戴设备、可食用药丸和可穿戴心率监测器。

Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor.

机构信息

Capstone College of Nursing, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;23(2):877. doi: 10.3390/s23020877.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the increase in concern for deaths and illness related to the increase in temperature globally, there is a growing need for real-time monitoring of workers for heat stress indicators. The purpose of this study was to determine the usability of the Slate Safety (SS) wearable physiological monitoring system.

METHODS

Twenty nurses performed a common task in a moderate or hot environment while wearing the SS device, the Polar 10 monitor, and having taken the e-Celsius ingestible pill. Data from each device was compared for correlation and accuracy.

RESULTS

High correlation was determined between the SS wearable device and the Polar 10 system (0.926) and the ingestible pill (0.595). The SS was comfortable to wear and easily monitored multiple participants from a distance.

CONCLUSIONS

The Slate Safety wearable device demonstrated accuracy in measuring core temperature and heart rate while not restricting the motion of the worker, and provided a remote monitoring platform for physiological parameters.

摘要

背景

随着人们对全球气温升高导致的死亡和疾病的关注度不断增加,对工人的热应激指标进行实时监测的需求日益增长。本研究旨在确定 Slate Safety(SS)可穿戴生理监测系统的可用性。

方法

20 名护士在中度或高温环境下佩戴 SS 设备、Polar 10 监测器并服用 e-Celsius 可食用药丸,执行一项常见任务。比较每个设备的数据相关性和准确性。

结果

SS 可穿戴设备与 Polar 10 系统(0.926)和可食用药丸(0.595)具有高度相关性。SS 佩戴舒适,可轻松远距离监测多个参与者。

结论

Slate Safety 可穿戴设备在不限制工人运动的情况下准确测量核心温度和心率,并为生理参数提供远程监测平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/9865127/00b88179a5e8/sensors-23-00877-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验