• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在优先排序伙伴关系中翻译证据:医疗保健提供者和食管癌患者之间的知识差距。

Translating evidence in a priority setting partnership: knowledge gaps between healthcare providers and oesophageal cancer patients.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Trinity St James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jan 21;31(2):126. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07523-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07523-3
PMID:36680653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9860237/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that health information is now more accessible than ever, knowledge gaps remain between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). To date, the patients' need for information following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer has not been adequately met.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify why knowledge gaps exist between oesophageal cancer patients and HCPs and how to address them.

METHODS

Purposive sampling of a group of people living with and after oesophageal cancer who had participated in a priority-setting partnership where 45% of questions from patients had existing evidence-based answers. A 7-set question series was developed for use in a patient/HCP focus group in addition to 11 individual phone interviews with survivors of oesophageal cancer. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted to explore oesophageal cancer patients' access to information. The data was analysed thematically, which involved coding all patient transcripts before identifying and reviewing key themes.

RESULTS

The three primary themes that emerged were as follows: opportunity (HCP team factors and relationship development), ability (patient factors) and priority (pacing of information delivery).

CONCLUSION

Effective communication between patients and HCPs was identified as an integral component of the enhancement of patient knowledge. HCPs should continue to refine and improve methods of information delivery and encourage conversations regarding information preferences.

摘要

简介

尽管现在获取健康信息比以往任何时候都更加容易,但患者和医疗保健提供者(HCP)之间仍然存在知识差距。迄今为止,尚未充分满足患者在诊断出食道癌后的信息需求。

目的

本研究的目的是确定为什么食道癌患者和 HCP 之间存在知识差距,以及如何解决这些差距。

方法

对一组患有食道癌并已康复的患者进行了有针对性的抽样调查,这些患者参加了一个重点制定伙伴关系,其中 45%的患者问题有现有的基于证据的答案。此外,还为患者/HCP 焦点小组开发了 7 组问题系列,以及对食道癌幸存者进行了 11 次单独的电话访谈。进行了定性半结构化访谈,以探讨食道癌患者获取信息的情况。对数据进行了主题分析,这包括对所有患者转录本进行编码,然后确定并审查关键主题。

结果

出现了三个主要主题:机会(HCP 团队因素和关系发展)、能力(患者因素)和优先级(信息传递的节奏)。

结论

患者和 HCP 之间的有效沟通被确定为增强患者知识的一个组成部分。HCP 应继续完善和改进信息传递方法,并鼓励就信息偏好进行对话。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf2/9867678/b68ba13bc0f2/520_2022_7523_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf2/9867678/b68ba13bc0f2/520_2022_7523_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbf2/9867678/b68ba13bc0f2/520_2022_7523_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Translating evidence in a priority setting partnership: knowledge gaps between healthcare providers and oesophageal cancer patients.在优先排序伙伴关系中翻译证据:医疗保健提供者和食管癌患者之间的知识差距。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jan 21;31(2):126. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07523-3.
2
Patients' experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study.加拿大癌症护理连续性患者体验:CanIMPACT研究结果
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):821-827.
3
Patient and healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes and barriers to handover and healthcare communication during chronic disease inpatient care in India: a qualitative exploratory study.印度慢性病住院护理期间患者及医疗服务提供者关于交接班和医疗沟通的知识、态度及障碍:一项定性探索性研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e028199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028199.
4
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives on the Implementation of a Web-Based Clinical Communication System for Cancer: A Qualitative Study.患者和医疗保健提供者对基于网络的癌症临床沟通系统实施的看法:一项定性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 3;29(11):8401-8414. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110662.
8
A qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals on providing vaccines information to patients.一项关于医疗保健专业人员向患者提供疫苗信息的看法的定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Dec;43(6):1683-1692. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01299-y. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
9
Supportive Care Needs: Perspectives of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers.支持性护理需求:癌症患者和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Jul;31(6):1033-1041. doi: 10.1177/10547738211045226. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Doctors' knowledge, practices, challenges, and limitations regarding disclosure of bad news: A multicentre study from Pakistan.医生在披露坏消息方面的知识、做法、挑战及局限性:一项来自巴基斯坦的多中心研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5491-5499. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_374_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
The role of family and culture in the disclosure of bad news: A multicentre cross-sectional study in Pakistan.家庭和文化在坏消息告知中的作用:巴基斯坦的一项多中心横断面研究。
PEC Innov. 2023 Aug 21;3:100200. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100200. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
3
BRAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Perspective from a Patient, a Caregiver, and an Oncologist.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological distress after esophageal cancer surgery and the predictive effect of dispositional optimism: a nationwide population-based longitudinal study.食管癌手术后的心理困扰和性格乐观的预测作用:一项全国性基于人群的纵向研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1315-1322. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06517-x. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Higher Dispositional Optimism Predicts Better Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Longitudinal Study.更高的倾向性乐观主义预示着食管癌手术后更好的健康相关生活质量:一项全国性基于人群的纵向研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7196-7205. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10026-w. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
BRAF 转移性结直肠癌:患者、护理人员和肿瘤学家的观点。
Adv Ther. 2023 Aug;40(8):3281-3290. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02552-8. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
Preferences in trust regarding the provision of cancer information among adults.
成年人对癌症信息提供方面的信任偏好。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Aug;113(4):457-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study.新冠疫情后英国基层医疗远程咨询的实施:一项混合方法纵向研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e166-e177. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948. Print 2021.
5
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.
6
Patient information needs in upper gastrointestinal cancer: what patients and their families want to know.上消化道癌患者的信息需求:患者及其家属想了解的内容。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Jan;89(1-2):20-24. doi: 10.1111/ans.14565. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Information-Seeking Behavior: Four Orientations to Cancer Communication.医患关系与信息寻求行为:癌症沟通的四种取向
J Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;33(2):79-87. doi: 10.1177/0825859718759881. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
Unmet information needs and limited health literacy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients over the course of cancer treatment.新诊断乳腺癌患者在癌症治疗过程中未满足的信息需求及有限的健康素养。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Sep;99(9):1511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
Dispositional optimism and perceived risk interact to predict intentions to learn genome sequencing results.性格乐观与感知风险相互作用,以预测了解基因组测序结果的意愿。
Health Psychol. 2015 Jul;34(7):718-28. doi: 10.1037/hea0000159. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.对医疗服务提供者让患者参与决策程度的评估:使用OPTION工具的研究的系统评价
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):542-61. doi: 10.1111/hex.12054. Epub 2013 Mar 4.