Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Centre for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University (UGent), Gent, Belgium.
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2023 Jan 21;9(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41522-023-00370-y.
Several oral diseases are characterized by a shift within the oral microbiome towards a pathogenic, dysbiotic composition. Broad-spectrum antimicrobials are often part of patient care. However, because of the rising antibiotic resistance, alternatives are increasingly desirable. Alternatively, supplying beneficial species through probiotics is increasingly showing favorable results. Unfortunately, these probiotics are rarely evaluated comparatively. In this study, the in vitro effects of three known and three novel Lactobacillus strains, together with four novel Streptococcus salivarius strains were comparatively evaluated for antagonistic effects on proximal agar growth, antimicrobial properties of probiotic supernatant and the probiotic's effects on in vitro periodontal biofilms. Strain-specific effects were observed as differences in efficacy between genera and differences within genera. While some of the Lactobacillus candidates were able to reduce the periodontal pathobiont A. actinomycetemcomitans, the S. salivarius strains were not. However, the S. salivarius strains were more effective against periodontal pathobionts P. intermedia, P. gingivalis, and F. nucleatum. Vexingly, most of the Lactobacillus strains also negatively affected the prevalence of commensal species within the biofilms, while this was lower for S. salivarius strains. Both within lactobacilli and streptococci, some strains showed significantly more inhibition of the pathobionts, indicating the importance of proper strain selection. Additionally, some species showed reductions in non-target species, which can result in unexpected and unexplored effects on the whole microbiome.
几种口腔疾病的特征是口腔微生物组向致病性、失调组成的转变。广谱抗生素通常是患者护理的一部分。然而,由于抗生素耐药性的上升,替代品越来越受到青睐。或者,通过益生菌供应有益物种也越来越显示出有利的结果。不幸的是,这些益生菌很少进行比较评估。在这项研究中,三种已知和三种新型乳杆菌菌株以及四种新型唾液链球菌菌株的体外效应被比较评估,以评估它们对近端琼脂生长的拮抗作用、益生菌上清液的抗菌特性以及益生菌对体外牙周生物膜的影响。观察到了菌株特异性效应,即属间和属内的功效差异。虽然一些乳杆菌候选物能够减少牙周病原菌 A. actinomycetemcomitans,但唾液链球菌菌株却不能。然而,唾液链球菌菌株对牙周病原菌 P. intermedia、P. gingivalis 和 F. nucleatum 的效果更显著。令人烦恼的是,大多数乳杆菌菌株也会对生物膜中共生物种的流行率产生负面影响,而唾液链球菌菌株的负面影响则较低。在乳杆菌和链球菌中,一些菌株对病原菌的抑制作用明显更强,这表明适当的菌株选择很重要。此外,一些物种对非目标物种的减少,这可能会对整个微生物组产生意想不到和未探索的影响。