Meijerink Lotte, Wever Kim E, Terstappen Fieke, Ganzevoort Wessel, Lely A Titia, Depmann Martine
Department of Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department for Health Evidence, SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BJOG. 2023 May;130(6):577-585. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17393. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
Several human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are investigating the effects of statins on pre-eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR). This cross-species meta-analysis summarises the preclinical evidence of statin use for PE and FGR.
Evaluate the effects of statins on maternal blood pressure (MBP) and birthweight (BW) in pregnancies complicated by PE or FGR.
PubMed and Embase.com were searched on 10 May 2022 using 'statins' and 'pregnancy'.
We included RCTs and cohorts with matched control groups as well as animal studies.
The main outcomes were MBP in mmHg and BW in grams. The standardised mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Subgroup analyses on species, statin, dose, timing and route of administration were performed if subgroups included at least three studies.
Our data included one human and 12 animal studies. Prenatal administration of statins significantly reduced MBP during pregnancy (SMD -2.49 mmHg [95% CI -4.26 to -0.71], p = 0.01). There was no significant effect of statins on BW (SMD 0.69 [95% CI -0.65 to 2.03], p = 0.28). Our subgroup analyses showed no effect on MBP of different doses, species or route of administration.
Our cross-species meta-analyses demonstrate that statins only reduce maternal blood pressure in rodent pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction and have no effect on birthweight across species. The broad confidence intervals, inconsistent direction of the observed effects across the studies and large risk of bias lead us to conclude that a solid base for further human RCTs is lacking.
多项人类随机对照试验(RCT)正在研究他汀类药物对先兆子痫(PE)和胎儿生长受限(FGR)的影响。这项跨物种荟萃分析总结了他汀类药物用于PE和FGR的临床前证据。
评估他汀类药物对合并PE或FGR的妊娠中孕妇血压(MBP)和出生体重(BW)的影响。
2022年5月10日在PubMed和Embase.com上使用“他汀类药物”和“妊娠”进行检索。
我们纳入了有匹配对照组的RCT和队列研究以及动物研究。
主要结局指标为以毫米汞柱为单位的MBP和以克为单位的BW。计算标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)。如果亚组包含至少三项研究,则对物种、他汀类药物、剂量、给药时间和给药途径进行亚组分析。
我们的数据包括1项人类研究和12项动物研究。孕期给予他汀类药物可显著降低孕期MBP(SMD -2.49 mmHg [95% CI -4.26至-0.71],p = 0.01)。他汀类药物对BW无显著影响(SMD 0.69 [95% CI -0.65至2.03],p = 0.28)。我们的亚组分析显示,不同剂量、物种或给药途径对MBP均无影响。
我们的跨物种荟萃分析表明,他汀类药物仅能降低合并先兆子痫或胎儿生长受限的啮齿类动物妊娠中的孕妇血压,且对所有物种的出生体重均无影响。宽泛的置信区间、各研究中观察到的效应方向不一致以及较大的偏倚风险使我们得出结论,缺乏进一步开展人类RCT的坚实基础。