• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隔离进食:强制喂食与单独监禁的规范比较。

Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement.

机构信息

Bioethics, School of Professional Studies, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Medical Ethics and Humanities Unit, LKS Medical Faculty, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 Jul;32(3):414-424. doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000883. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1017/S0963180122000883
PMID:36688294
Abstract

The practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.

摘要

单独监禁(SC)的做法在文献中被确立为监狱系统中常见的酷刑行为,许多国际和国家人权组织呼吁废除这种做法。在文献中,另一个有争议的话题是对绝食囚犯进行强制喂食(FF)的做法。本文旨在通过建立一个平等论点来反对 FF,该论点指出:如果 SC 被认为是不道德的做法(实际上它应该是),那么 FF 在道德上也是不允许的。总之,本文将认为对绝食囚犯进行 FF 是对他们基本道德权利的侵犯,构成了残忍和不人道的待遇,因此应该被废除。

相似文献

1
Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement.隔离进食:强制喂食与单独监禁的规范比较。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 Jul;32(3):414-424. doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000883. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
On the Force-Feeding of Prisoners on Hunger Strike.关于对绝食抗议囚犯的强制喂食
HEC Forum. 2019 Mar;31(1):29-48. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9365-4.
3
Solitary confinement and mental illness in U.S. prisons: a challenge for medical ethics.美国监狱中的单独监禁与精神疾病:医学伦理面临的挑战。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(1):104-8.
4
The land of no milk and no honey: force feeding in Israel.没有牛奶和蜂蜜的土地:以色列的强制喂食
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2017 Nov;34(3-4):158-188. doi: 10.1007/s40592-017-0071-9.
5
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.监狱中的姑息治疗与临终关怀:文献内容分析
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024.
6
The Minnesota Starvation Experiment and Force Feeding of Prisoners-Relying on Unethical Research to Justify the Unjustifiable.明尼苏达饥饿实验与囚犯强制喂食——以不道德的研究为不合理行为辩护。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Sep;18(3):407-416. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10109-z. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Using Ethics Committees to Justify Force-Feeding Political Prisoners in Israel.利用伦理委员会为以色列强制喂食政治犯辩护。
Health Hum Rights. 2023 Dec;25(2):53-65.
8
[Force-feeding of hunger-striking prisoners].[对绝食抗议囚犯的强制喂食]
Harefuah. 2014 Sep;153(9):554-6.
9
[Hunger strike and forced feeding: a historical look at medical practices].绝食与强制喂食:医学实践的历史审视
Rev Med Suisse. 2010 Dec 1;6(273):2313-8.
10
Hunger strikers: ethical and legal dimensions of medical complicity in torture at Guantanamo Bay.绝食者:关塔那摩湾酷刑中医疗共谋的伦理和法律维度。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Dec;28(6):616-24. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008868. Epub 2013 Sep 30.