• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TRIANGLE 手术在胰腺外科中的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Safety and efficacy of TRIANGLE operation applied in pancreatic surgery: a protocol of the systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e059977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059977.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059977
PMID:36691122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9454055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic surgery is regarded as the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC). As the neoadjuvant therapy is applied widely nowadays, the proportion of patients with PC undergoing surgery also with locally advanced tumour findings has increased accordingly. Especially in these situations, a radical resection of all tumour tissues is challenging. A novel surgical strategy has been introduced recently to achieve this aim, namely the TRIANGLE operation which comprises the radical resection of all nerve and lymphatic tissue between coeliac artery, superior mesenteric artery and mesenteric-portal axis without including extended lymphadenectomy outside this area. Due to currently published studies, Triangle Operation is a safe and feasible procedure. However, this has not been systematically analysed to date. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate surgical and postoperative outcomes of Triangle Operation in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception until 31 December 2022. This study will include all articles comparing Triangle Operation versus non-Triangle Operation in pancreatic surgery to assess outcomes. The primary endpoints will be R0 resection rate and 1-year overall survival. The secondary endpoints will be delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatic fistula, post pancreatectomy haemorrhages and reoperation incidence, overall complications, mortality and 3-year overall survival. The study selection, study quality assessment, data extraction and critical appraisal will be carried out by two reviewers. Inter-reviewer disagreements will be evaluated by discussion with a third reviewer. Besides, a subgroup analysis will be conducted focused on robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in detail. Additionally, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework will be performed to evaluate the strength of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis will not require ethical approval. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021234721.

摘要

背景

胰腺切除术被认为是治疗胰腺癌(PC)的唯一根治性治疗方法。由于目前广泛应用新辅助治疗,因此接受手术治疗且肿瘤局部进展的 PC 患者比例相应增加。特别是在这些情况下,根治性切除所有肿瘤组织具有挑战性。最近引入了一种新的手术策略来实现这一目标,即 TRIANGLE 手术,它包括在腹腔动脉、肠系膜上动脉和肠系膜门静脉轴之间的所有神经和淋巴组织的根治性切除,而不包括该区域以外的广泛淋巴结清扫。由于目前发表的研究,Triangle 手术是一种安全可行的手术。然而,到目前为止,这还没有系统地分析过。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估胰腺手术中 Triangle 手术的手术和术后结果。

方法和分析

将从开始到 2022 年 12 月 31 日在 Pubmed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中搜索文献。本研究将包括所有比较胰腺手术中 Triangle 手术与非 Triangle 手术的文章,以评估结果。主要终点是 R0 切除率和 1 年总生存率。次要终点是胃排空延迟、术后胰瘘、胰腺切除术后出血和再次手术发生率、总并发症、死亡率和 3 年总生存率。将由两名评审员进行研究选择、研究质量评估、数据提取和关键评估。如果两位评审员存在分歧,将通过与第三位评审员讨论来评估。此外,还将进行亚组分析,重点关注机器人手术、腹腔镜手术和开放手术。此外,还将使用推荐评估、发展和评估分级(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations,GRADE)框架来评估证据的强度。

伦理和传播

本系统评价和荟萃分析不需要伦理批准。结果将发表在同行评议的科学期刊上。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021234721。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b11/9454055/9f9a280e3983/bmjopen-2021-059977f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b11/9454055/9f9a280e3983/bmjopen-2021-059977f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b11/9454055/9f9a280e3983/bmjopen-2021-059977f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of TRIANGLE operation applied in pancreatic surgery: a protocol of the systematic review and meta-analysis.TRIANGLE 手术在胰腺外科中的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e059977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059977.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for patients with borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.对比边界可切除和局部进展期胰导管腺癌患者新辅助放疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e050558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050558.
4
Multivisceral Oncological Resections Involving the Pancreas: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.涉及胰腺的多脏器肿瘤切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 11;13:e54089. doi: 10.2196/54089.
5
[Short-term outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer].[新辅助化疗后局部晚期胰腺癌TRIANGLE手术的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 1;62(2):147-154. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230615-000234.
6
Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: does a superior drainage system exist? A protocol for systematic review.胰腺切除术后被动与主动腹腔引流的比较:是否存在更优的引流系统?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e031319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031319.
7
Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.胃肠道间质瘤的开放性和微创手术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e050414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414.
8
Incidence of colonic fistulas in patients with colon cancer submitted to robotic surgery versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.接受机器人手术与腹腔镜结直肠手术的结肠癌患者结肠瘘发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 12;13(5):e065011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065011.
9
Conventional partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus an extended pancreatoduodenectomy (triangle operation) for pancreatic head cancers-study protocol for the randomised controlled TRIANGLE trial.常规胰头十二指肠切除术与扩大胰头十二指肠切除术(三角手术)治疗胰头癌的随机对照研究:TRIANGLE 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 30;24(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07337-6.
10
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.经屈氏韧带入路腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4836-4837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5561-6. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of prognosis and postoperative morbidities between standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and the TRIANGLE technique for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.标准胰十二指肠切除术与TRIANGLE技术治疗可切除胰腺导管腺癌的预后及术后并发症比较。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Mar 27;16(3):689-699. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.689.
2
Current Approaches for the Curative-Intent Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.胰腺导管腺癌根治性手术治疗的当前方法
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;15(9):2584. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092584.

本文引用的文献

1
Landmark Series: Importance of Pancreatic Resection Margins.里程碑系列:胰腺切除切缘的重要性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1542-1550. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11168-7. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
The TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic head and body cancers: early postoperative outcomes.三角手术治疗胰头和胰体癌:术后早期结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Mar;24(3):332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.432. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Outcomes of Margin Status on Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy.新辅助治疗的胰腺导管腺癌切缘状态对生存的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jun;232(6):1022-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
5
Commentary on: Divestment or skeletonization of the SMA or the hepatic artery for locally advanced pancreatic ductal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.关于新辅助治疗后局部晚期胰腺导管癌的肠系膜上动脉或肝动脉去血管化或骨骼化的评论
Surgery. 2021 May;169(5):1039-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.10.042. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
The 'TRIANGLE Operation' by Laparoscopy: Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer.腹腔镜下“TRIANGLE 操作”:胰头边界可切除性癌的根治性胰十二指肠切除术伴主要血管切除
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May;27(5):1613-1614. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08101-4. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Pancreatic resection for cancer-the Heidelberg technique.癌症的胰腺切除术——海德堡技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Dec;404(8):1017-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01839-1. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
The TRIANGLE operation - radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study.TRIANGLE手术——晚期胰腺癌新辅助治疗后的根治性手术:一项单臂观察性研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Nov;19(11):1001-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.