Suppr超能文献

成人住院患者用药错误的流行率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,截至 2017 年,旨在探讨异质性的来源。

Prevalence of medication administration errors in hospitalized adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis up to 2017 to explore sources of heterogeneity.

机构信息

French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), Saint-Denis, France.

EA 7379 EpiDermE, Paris-Est Creteil University, Creteil, France.

出版信息

Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;37(3):531-548. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12873. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

Abstract

Previous estimates to meta-analyze administration error rates were limited by the high statistical heterogeneity, restricting their use. This study aimed to investigate sources of heterogeneity in pooled administration error rates in hospitalized adults. We systematically searched scientific databases up to November 2017 for studies presenting error rates/relevant numerical data in hospitalized adults. We conducted separate meta-analyses for the numerators: One Medication Error (OME) (each dose can be correct or incorrect) and Total Number of Errors (TNE) (more than one error per dose could be counted), using the generic inverse variance with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I and Cochran's Q test. We meta-analyzed 33 studies. The global pooled analyses based on the OME and TNE numerators showed very high heterogeneity (I  = 100%; p < 0.00001). For each meta-analysis, subgroup analyses based on study characteristics (countries, wards, population, routes of administration, error detection methods, and medications) yielded results with consistently elevated heterogeneity. Beyond these characteristics, we stratified the studies according to the mean error prevalence level as the threshold. Based on the OME numerator, we identified two subgroups of low (0.15[0.13-0.17]; I  = 0%; p = 0.43) and high (0.26[0.24-0.27]; I  = 38%; p = 0.17) pooled prevalence rates, with controlled heterogeneity. Similarly, for the TNE numerator, we identified two subgroups of low (0.10[0.09-0.10]; I  = 0%; p = 0.76) and high (0.28[0.27-0.29]; I  = 0%; p = 0.89) pooled prevalence rates, with controlled heterogeneity. These subgroups differed regarding the denominators used: Total opportunities for errors versus others (doses, observations, administrations). Calculation methods, specifically the denominator, seem a primary factor in explaining heterogeneity in error rates. Standardizing numerators, denominators, and definitions is necessary.

摘要

先前对管理错误率进行荟萃分析的估计受到高度统计异质性的限制,限制了其使用。本研究旨在调查住院成人中汇集的管理错误率的异质性来源。我们系统地搜索了科学数据库,截至 2017 年 11 月,以获取在住院成人中报告错误率/相关数值数据的研究。我们对每个剂量可以是正确或不正确的一药错误 (OME) 和总错误数 (TNE) (每个剂量可能不止一个错误) 的分子分别进行了荟萃分析,使用通用倒数方差和 95%置信区间。使用 I 和 Cochran's Q 检验评估异质性。我们荟萃分析了 33 项研究。基于 OME 和 TNE 分子的全球汇总分析显示出非常高的异质性 (I = 100%; p < 0.00001)。对于每个荟萃分析,根据研究特征(国家、病房、人群、给药途径、错误检测方法和药物)进行亚组分析,结果始终显示出较高的异质性。除了这些特征之外,我们还根据平均错误流行率水平作为阈值对研究进行分层。基于 OME 分子,我们确定了低(0.15[0.13-0.17]; I = 0%; p = 0.43)和高(0.26[0.24-0.27]; I = 38%; p = 0.17)两组荟萃流行率,具有可控的异质性。同样,对于 TNE 分子,我们确定了低(0.10[0.09-0.10]; I = 0%; p = 0.76)和高(0.28[0.27-0.29]; I = 0%; p = 0.89)两组荟萃流行率,具有可控的异质性。这些亚组在使用的分母方面有所不同:总错误机会与其他机会(剂量、观察、给药)。计算方法,特别是分母,似乎是解释错误率异质性的主要因素。标准化分子、分母和定义是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验