Ouhmad Nawal, El-Hage Wissam, Combalbert Nicolas
EA 2114, laboratoire PAVeA, Université de Tours, 3 rue des Tanneurs, 37041, Tours cedex, France.
UMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Neuropsychiatr. 2023 Jun;37(2):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s40211-022-00453-w. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
The present study investigated the interactions between emotion regulation strategies and cognitive distortions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We also examined differences in emotion regulation and cognitive distortions across the trauma spectrum.
The study was conducted in France between December 2019 and August 2020 and was approved by the university ethics committee. We recruited 180 participants aged over 18, with 3 groups of 60 each: (1) patients diagnosed with PTSD, (2) trauma-exposed without PTSD, (3) no history of trauma. Exclusion criteria were a history of neurological or mental disorders, psychoactive substance abuse, and a history of physical injury that could affect outcomes. All participants completed the Life Events Checklist‑5 (LEC-5), Post-traumatic Check List‑5 (PCL-5), Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), and Cognitive Distortions scale for Adults (EDC-A). Correlation analysis was performed to observe the relationship between PTSD severity and cognitive functioning. Correlations between cognitive distortions and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies were calculated for the PTSD group. A moderation analysis of the whole sample was conducted to examine the relationship between cognitive distortions, emotion regulation strategies, and PTSD.
Participants with PTSD scored significantly higher on the PCL‑5 and for dissociation than the other groups. PCL‑5 scores were positively correlated with maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and acceptance. They were also correlated with positive and negative dichotomous reasoning and negative minimization. Analysis of the PTSD group revealed correlations between maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and negative cognitive distortions. The moderation analysis revealed the cognitive distortions explaining the relationship between emotion regulation strategies and trauma exposure overall, and how they exacerbate emotional problems in PTSD.
The study provides indications for management of PTSD patients. Inclusion of an intermediate group of individuals exposed to trauma without PTSD revealed differences in the observed alterations. It would be interesting to extend the cross-sectional observation design to study traumatic events that may cause a specific type of disorder.
本研究调查了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)中情绪调节策略与认知歪曲之间的相互作用。我们还研究了整个创伤范围内情绪调节和认知歪曲的差异。
该研究于2019年12月至2020年8月在法国进行,并获得了大学伦理委员会的批准。我们招募了180名年龄超过18岁的参与者,分为3组,每组60人:(1)被诊断为PTSD的患者,(2)暴露于创伤但未患PTSD的人,(3)无创伤史的人。排除标准为有神经或精神疾病史、精神活性物质滥用史以及可能影响结果的身体损伤史。所有参与者均完成了生活事件清单-5(LEC-5)、创伤后检查表-5(PCL-5)、解离体验量表(DES)、认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)以及成人认知歪曲量表(EDC-A)。进行相关分析以观察PTSD严重程度与认知功能之间的关系。计算PTSD组认知歪曲与适应不良情绪调节策略之间的相关性。对整个样本进行调节分析,以检验认知歪曲、情绪调节策略与PTSD之间的关系。
PTSD患者在PCL-5和解离量表上的得分显著高于其他组。PCL-5得分与适应不良情绪调节策略及接纳呈正相关。它们还与正负二分法推理和消极最小化相关。对PTSD组的分析揭示了适应不良情绪调节策略与消极认知歪曲之间的相关性。调节分析揭示了认知歪曲解释了情绪调节策略与总体创伤暴露之间的关系,以及它们如何加剧PTSD中的情绪问题。
该研究为PTSD患者的管理提供了依据。纳入暴露于创伤但未患PTSD的中间组个体揭示了观察到的改变中的差异。扩展横断面观察设计以研究可能导致特定类型障碍的创伤事件将是很有趣的。