• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准剂量与高剂量达托霉素疗效与安全性的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of standard- and high-dose daptomycin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Yokohama General Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Division of Pharmacodynamics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr;89(4):1291-1303. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15671. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.15671
PMID:36693240
Abstract

AIMS

Standard doses of daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg were used for the treatment of skin and soft tissue for infections and bacteraemia, respectively. However, increased doses of daptomycin are recommended for complicated infections by Gram-positive organisms.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. We compared treatment success between standard-dose (SD, 4-6 mg/kg) and high-dose (HD, >6 mg/kg) daptomycin in patients with all-cause bacteraemia, complicated bacteraemia, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection as the primary outcome. We also compared the success between SD and HD2 (≥8 mg/kg) daptomycin treatments in patients with these diseases as the secondary outcome. The incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was evaluated as safety.

RESULTS

In patients with complicated bacteraemia and infective endocarditis, the treatment success was significantly lower in the SD group than in the HD group (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.76 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.82) and HD2 group (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69 and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60), respectively. A significant difference was demonstrated only in the HD2 group in patients with bacteraemia, including simple infection. SD did not decrease the success rate for the treatment of osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection. The incidence of elevated CPK was significantly lower in SD group than in HD group.

CONCLUSION

SD daptomycin was associated with significantly lower treatment success than HD in patients with complicated bacteraemia/infective endocarditis. The CPK elevation should be considered in patients treated with high daptomycin doses.

摘要

目的

万古霉素的标准剂量为 4 和 6mg/kg,分别用于治疗皮肤和软组织感染和菌血症。然而,对于革兰氏阳性菌引起的复杂感染,建议使用更高剂量的万古霉素。

方法

我们使用 4 个数据库进行了系统评价。我们将标准剂量(SD,4-6mg/kg)和高剂量(HD,>6mg/kg)万古霉素治疗所有病因菌血症、复杂菌血症、感染性心内膜炎、骨髓炎和异物/假体感染患者的治疗成功率作为主要结局进行比较。我们还将 SD 和 HD2(≥8mg/kg)万古霉素治疗这些疾病患者的成功率作为次要结局进行了比较。评估肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)升高的发生率作为安全性。

结果

在复杂菌血症和感染性心内膜炎患者中,SD 组的治疗成功率明显低于 HD 组(比值比[OR] 0.48,95%置信区间[CI] 0.30-0.76 和 OR 0.50,95%CI 0.30-0.82)和 HD2 组(OR 0.38,95%CI 0.21-0.69 和 OR 0.30,95%CI 0.15-0.60)。仅在包括单纯感染在内的菌血症患者中,HD2 组的差异具有统计学意义。SD 并未降低骨髓炎和异物/假体感染的治疗成功率。CPK 升高的发生率在 SD 组明显低于 HD 组。

结论

与 HD 相比,SD 万古霉素治疗复杂菌血症/感染性心内膜炎患者的治疗成功率明显较低。在使用高剂量万古霉素治疗的患者中应考虑 CPK 升高的问题。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of standard- and high-dose daptomycin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.标准剂量与高剂量达托霉素疗效与安全性的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr;89(4):1291-1303. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15671. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
9
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
10
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Salvage Therapy With a Triple Combination of Daptomycin, Carbapenem, and Oxazolidinone in Patients With Persistent MRSA Bacteremia of Cardiovascular Focus: A Case Series.达托霉素、碳青霉烯类和恶唑烷酮三联疗法用于心血管相关持续性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的挽救治疗:病例系列
J Pharm Technol. 2025 Apr 27:87551225251335178. doi: 10.1177/87551225251335178.
2
PK/PD Analysis of High-Dose Daptomycin Use in the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections: Data from a Real-World Setting.高剂量达托霉素用于治疗骨与关节感染的药代动力学/药效学分析:来自真实临床环境的数据
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 30;13(2):304. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020304.
3
Evaluation of Daptomycin Use in Outpatients With Methicillin-Sensitive Bloodstream Infections.
对甲氧西林敏感血流感染门诊患者使用达托霉素的评估。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 17;12(2):ofaf012. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf012. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Emergence of Daptomycin Nonsusceptibility and Treatment Failure in Patients With Bacteremia.菌血症患者中达托霉素耐药性的出现及治疗失败情况
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 10;11(11):ofae610. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae610. eCollection 2024 Nov.