• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的生活质量:一项前瞻性纵向为期一年的随访研究。

Health-related quality of life after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: a prospective longitudinal one-year follow-up study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06917-w. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-023-06917-w
PMID:36694036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10293409/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore how patients treated for endometrial cancer (EC) with robotic surgery are affected in symptoms of anxiety and depression and HRQoL in the long term.

METHODS

Women scheduled for primary robotic surgery for EC were included (n = 64), in this single-center study. Socioeconomic variables were obtained at baseline. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancers Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), its module for EC (EN24), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) were followed prospectively from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The number of patients scoring above the clinical threshold for anxiety decreased from 17 (27.0%) at baseline to 4 (7.0%) at 2 weeks (p = 0.012). Depressive symptoms were reported in 20% of patients at baseline and did not change significantly during the one-year follow-up (p = 0.58). A significant decrease in Global health status was seen at 2 weeks (from 69.8 to 62.7; p = 0.048), with return to baseline levels after 3 months (68.5; p = 0.32) and stable at 1 year. Unemployment, low income, and adjuvant therapy correlated with lower Global health status at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The significant proportion of patients with anxiety symptoms preoperatively reduced prompt after surgery, while the proportion with depression remained constant, indicating that the primary treatment has no long-term negative effect on patients' mental health. At 3 months, there is no obvious remaining negative impact on patients' HRQoL, and these results are consistent after 1 year.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨接受机器人手术治疗子宫内膜癌(EC)的患者在长期内焦虑和抑郁症状以及 HRQoL 方面受到的影响。

方法

本单中心研究纳入了 64 名计划接受原发性机器人手术治疗 EC 的女性患者。在基线时获得了社会经济变量。前瞻性地从基线随访至术后 2 周、3 个月和 1 年,使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 项(QLQ-C30)、EC 模块(EN24)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)。

结果

基线时有 17 名(27.0%)患者的焦虑评分超过临床阈值,术后 2 周时降至 4 名(7.0%)(p=0.012)。基线时有 20%的患者存在抑郁症状,在一年的随访过程中无明显变化(p=0.58)。在术后 2 周时,整体健康状况评分显著下降(从 69.8 降至 62.7;p=0.048),但在术后 3 个月时恢复至基线水平(68.5;p=0.32),并在 1 年时保持稳定。失业、低收入和辅助治疗与术后 3 个月时较低的整体健康状况相关。

结论

术前存在焦虑症状的患者比例在手术后迅速降低,而存在抑郁症状的患者比例保持不变,这表明主要治疗对患者的心理健康没有长期负面影响。在术后 3 个月时,患者的 HRQoL 没有明显的剩余负面影响,且这些结果在 1 年后仍然一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/7082f3f0a43d/404_2023_6917_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/0a6417443710/404_2023_6917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/af6aec5d58e3/404_2023_6917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/df2f9e707319/404_2023_6917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/3e7de56252c4/404_2023_6917_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/7082f3f0a43d/404_2023_6917_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/0a6417443710/404_2023_6917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/af6aec5d58e3/404_2023_6917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/df2f9e707319/404_2023_6917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/3e7de56252c4/404_2023_6917_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e267/10293409/7082f3f0a43d/404_2023_6917_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: a prospective longitudinal one-year follow-up study.机器人手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的生活质量:一项前瞻性纵向为期一年的随访研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06917-w. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Longitudinal effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node staging on patient-reported outcomes in endometrial cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study.辅助化疗和淋巴结分期对子宫内膜癌幸存者患者报告结局的纵向影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):90.e1-90.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial.高危型子宫内膜癌全面手术分期后的长期生活质量 - RASHEC 试验的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1671-1676. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521987. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Evaluation of quality of life, body image and surgical outcomes of robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping in low-risk endometrial cancer patients - A Robotic Gyne Club study.评价机器人全腹腔镜子宫切除术和前哨淋巴结绘图术在低危子宫内膜癌患者中的生活质量、身体形象和手术效果:机器人妇科俱乐部研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Sep;99(9):1238-1245. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13844. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer.前瞻性队列研究比较了接受机器人手术、腹腔镜手术和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的女性的生活质量和性健康结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):476-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.558. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌女性患者——并发症、女性患者体验、生活质量及卫生经济学评估
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
7
Validation of the QLQ-EN24 instrument for the assessment of health-related quality of life for women with endometrial cancer in México.QLQ - EN24工具用于评估墨西哥子宫内膜癌女性健康相关生活质量的效度验证。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-05990-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Independent psychometric validation of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24).欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织子宫内膜癌生活质量问卷模块(EORTC QLQ-EN24)的独立心理测量学验证
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12639. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Recovery of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术伴体腔内转流术患者健康相关生活质量的恢复。
BJU Int. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-79. doi: 10.1111/bju.15505. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Prospective assessment of quality of life and psychological distress in patients with gynecologic malignancy: a 1-year prospective study.前瞻性评估妇科恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量和心理困扰:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jul;22(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182559c03.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality-of-Life Trajectories and Perceived Stress in Women Treated for Uterine Cancer: A Six-Month Prospective Study.子宫癌治疗女性的生活质量轨迹与感知压力:一项为期六个月的前瞻性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1787. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151787.
2
Perioperative/postoperative anxiety and its interventions in gynecological cancers: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence.妇科癌症围手术期/术后焦虑及其干预措施:临床证据的综合综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 22;15:1383029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1383029. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 子宫内膜癌管理指南。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors.结直肠癌幸存者健康相关生活质量的社会经济差异。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):459-467. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00767-9. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States.
基于 13 个欧洲国家、加拿大和美国的 15386 人,为 EORTC QLQ-C30 健康相关生活质量问卷制定的普通人群常模数据。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial.高危型子宫内膜癌全面手术分期后的长期生活质量 - RASHEC 试验的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1671-1676. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521987. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Depression and anxiety in patients with cancer.癌症患者的抑郁和焦虑。
BMJ. 2018 Apr 25;361:k1415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1415.
6
Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes.子宫内膜癌患者的生存状况:患者报告结局的系统评价。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Feb;148(2):403-413. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜手术及剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Health-related quality of life after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer--A prospective cohort study.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in endometrial cancer clinical trials: a call for action!子宫内膜癌临床试验中的生活质量与患者报告结局:行动呼吁!
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Nov;24(9):1693-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000299.
10
Quality of life research in endometrial cancer: what is needed to advance progress in this disease site? Methodological considerations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Symptom Benefit Working Group brainstorming session, Leiden 2012.子宫内膜癌的生活质量研究:在该疾病领域取得进展需要什么?2012年莱顿妇科肿瘤协作组症状获益工作组头脑风暴会议的方法学考量
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Nov;24(9):1686-92. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000245.