• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危型子宫内膜癌全面手术分期后的长期生活质量 - RASHEC 试验的结果。

Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial.

机构信息

a Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

b Theme Cancer , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1671-1676. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521987. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521987
PMID:30289327
Abstract

PURPOSE

The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes after comprehensive surgical staging including infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) are unknown. Our aim was to investigate the long-term HRQoL between robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and laparotomy (LT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 120 women with high-risk stage I-II EC were randomised to RALS or LT for hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, pelvic and infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the previously reported Robot-Assisted Surgery for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer trial. The HRQoL was measured with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-30) and its supplementary questionnaire module for endometrial cancer (QLQ-EN24) questionnaire. Women were assessed before and 12 months after surgery. In addition, the EuroQol Eq5D non-disease specific questionnaire was used for descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the functional scales (including global health status) in the intention to treat analysis, though LT conferred a small clinically important difference (CID) over RALS in 'cognitive functioning' albeit not statistically significant -6 (95% CI-14 to 0, p = .06). LT conferred a significantly better outcome for the 'nausea and vomiting' item though it did not reach a CID, 4 (95% CI 1 to 7, p = .01). In the EORTC-QLQ/QLQ-EN24, no significant differences were observed. Eq5D-3L questionnaire demonstrated a higher proportion of women reporting any extent of mobility impairment 12 months after surgery in the LT arm (p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Overall, laparotomy and robot-assisted surgery conferred similar HRQoL 12 months after comprehensive staging for high-risk EC.

摘要

目的

在高危子宫内膜癌(EC)患者中进行包括肾下主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术在内的综合外科分期后,健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的结果尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)与剖腹手术(LT)之间的长期 HRQoL。

患者和方法

共有 120 名高危 I-II 期 EC 患者随机分为 RALS 或 LT 组,行子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术、盆腔和肾下主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术,此前报道的机器人辅助手术治疗高危子宫内膜癌试验中。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 项(EORTC-QLQ-30)及其子宫内膜癌补充问卷模块(QLQ-EN24)来测量 HRQoL。在手术前和手术后 12 个月对女性进行评估。此外,还使用 EuroQol Eq5D 非疾病特定问卷进行描述性分析。

结果

在意向治疗分析中,功能量表(包括总体健康状况)没有差异,但 LT 在“认知功能”方面较 RALS 具有较小的临床重要差异(CID),尽管无统计学意义-6(95%CI-14 至 0,p=0.06)。LT 在“恶心和呕吐”项目上的结果明显更好,但未达到 CID,4(95%CI 1 至 7,p=0.01)。在 EORTC-QLQ/QLQ-EN24 中,未观察到显著差异。Eq5D-3L 问卷显示,手术后 12 个月 LT 组报告任何程度活动能力受损的女性比例更高(p=0.03)。

结论

总体而言,在高危 EC 患者的综合分期后,剖腹手术和机器人辅助手术在 12 个月后均具有相似的 HRQoL。

相似文献

1
Long-term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high-risk endometrial cancer - results from the RASHEC trial.高危型子宫内膜癌全面手术分期后的长期生活质量 - RASHEC 试验的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1671-1676. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521987. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开腹手术用于高危子宫内膜癌女性肾下主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的随机对照试验
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;79:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
3
Lymphedema, serious adverse events, and imaging 1 year after comprehensive staging for endometrial cancer: results from the RASHEC trial.癌症患者接受全面分期后 1 年的淋巴水肿、严重不良事件和影像学评估:来自 RASHEC 试验的结果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jan;29(1):86-93. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000019.
4
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
5
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.机器人辅助子宫内膜癌分期的前哨淋巴结活检术:进一步改善围手术期结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):41-47. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000672. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌:一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.通过传统剖腹术、标准腹腔镜检查和机器人技术进行子宫内膜癌分期的结果与成本比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
New insights into early recovery after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer.机器人手术治疗子宫内膜癌后早期恢复的新见解。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
9
[Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].[机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者手术并发症的分级评估及相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010.
10
Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.Telelap ALF-X与标准腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的单机构回顾性队列研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Thai Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Comparative Analysis Using EQ5D Utility Scores Across States.泰国子宫内膜癌患者健康相关生活质量评估:基于EQ5D效用得分对不同状态的比较分析
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Feb;8(2):e70139. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70139.
2
Quality of life and survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: A tertiary center observational study.子宫癌肉瘤患者的生活质量与生存情况:一项三级中心观察性研究。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jan 17;57:101679. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101679. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Advantages of Robotic Surgery for Patients of Reproductive Age with Endometrial Cancer.
机器人手术对育龄期子宫内膜癌患者的优势。
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;14(9):1108. doi: 10.3390/life14091108.
4
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
5
Clinical-Psychological Aspects Involved in Gynecological Surgery: Description of Peri-Operative Psychopathological Symptoms and Illness Behavior.妇科手术涉及的临床心理学方面:围手术期心理病理症状及患病行为描述
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023 Jun 20;16(1):56-66. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5981. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
6
Health-related quality of life after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: a prospective longitudinal one-year follow-up study.机器人手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的生活质量:一项前瞻性纵向为期一年的随访研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06917-w. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
7
Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的预后和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 22;2022:9384134. doi: 10.1155/2022/9384134. eCollection 2022.
8
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Symptoms and Functioning after Treatment for Endometrial Cancer.子宫内膜癌治疗后患者报告症状和功能的评估。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 22;29(8):5213-5222. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080414.
9
Quality of life in patients with endometrial carcinoma: A Longitudinal Study.子宫内膜癌患者的生活质量:一项纵向研究。
Nurs Open. 2022 May;9(3):1815-1821. doi: 10.1002/nop2.927. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.欧洲妇科肿瘤学会/欧洲放射肿瘤学会/西班牙妇科肿瘤学会子宫内膜癌患者管理指南
Virchows Arch. 2021 Feb;478(2):153-190. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03007-z.