NHS Business Services Authority, Stella House, Newburn, Newcastle, NE15 8NY, UK.
School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15046-7.
This systematic review sought to identify, explain and interpret the prominent or recurring themes relating to the barriers and facilitators of reporting and recording of self-harm in young people across different settings, such as the healthcare setting, schools and the criminal justice setting.
A search strategy was developed to ensure all relevant literature around the reporting and recording of self-harm in young people was obtained. Literature searches were conducted in six databases and a grey literature search of policy documents and relevant material was also conducted. Due to the range of available literature, both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were considered for inclusion.
Following the completion of the literature searches and sifting, nineteen papers were eligible for inclusion. Facilitators to reporting self-harm across the different settings were found to be recognising self-harm behaviours, using passive screening, training and experience, positive communication, and safe, private information sharing. Barriers to reporting self-harm included confidentiality concerns, negative perceptions of young people, communication difficulties, stigma, staff lacking knowledge around self-harm, and a lack of time, money and resources. Facilitators to recording self-harm across the different settings included being open to discussing what is recorded, services working together and co-ordinated help. Barriers to recording self-harm were mainly around stigma, the information being recorded and the ability of staff being able to do so, and their length of professional experience.
Following the review of the current evidence, it was apparent that there was still progress to be made to improve the reporting and recording of self-harm in young people, across the different settings. Future work should concentrate on better understanding the facilitators, whilst aiming to ameliorate the barriers.
本系统评价旨在确定、解释和解释与不同环境(如医疗环境、学校和刑事司法环境)中报告和记录青少年自残相关的障碍和促进因素的突出或反复出现的主题。
制定了搜索策略,以确保获得有关年轻人报告和记录自残的所有相关文献。在六个数据库中进行了文献检索,并对政策文件和相关材料进行了灰色文献检索。由于可用文献的范围很广,因此考虑纳入定量和定性方法。
在完成文献搜索和筛选后,有 19 篇论文符合纳入标准。在不同环境中报告自残的促进因素包括识别自残行为、使用被动筛查、培训和经验、积极沟通以及安全、隐私信息共享。报告自残的障碍包括保密性问题、对年轻人的负面看法、沟通困难、污名化、工作人员对自残知识的缺乏,以及缺乏时间、金钱和资源。在不同环境中记录自残的促进因素包括对要记录的内容进行公开讨论、服务共同合作和协调帮助。记录自残的障碍主要是污名化、要记录的信息以及工作人员的能力,以及他们的专业经验长短。
在审查了当前的证据后,显然仍需要在不同环境中改进年轻人自残的报告和记录,以取得进展。未来的工作应集中在更好地理解促进因素,同时努力改善障碍。