Shchelkunov S N, Sergeev A A, Titova K A, Pyankov S A, Starostina E V, Borgoyakova M B, Kisakova L A, Kisakov D N, Karpenko L I, Yakubitskiy S N
State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR, Rospotrebnadzor, Koltsovo, Novosibirsk region, 630559 Russia.
Acta Naturae. 2022 Oct-Dec;14(4):111-118. doi: 10.32607/actanaturae.11857.
The spread of the monkeypox virus infection among humans in many countries outside of Africa, which started in 2022, is now drawing the attention of the medical and scientific communities to the fact that immunization against this infection is sorely needed. According to current guidelines, immunization of people with the first-generation smallpox vaccine based on the vaccinia virus (VACV) LIVP strain, which is licensed in Russia, should be performed via transepidermal inoculation (skin scarification, s.s.). However, the long past experience of using this vaccination technique suggests that it does not ensure virus inoculation into patients' skin with enough reliability. The procedure of intradermal (i.d.) injection of a vaccine can be an alternative to s.s. inoculation. The effectiveness of i.d. vaccination can depend on the virus injection site on the body. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the development of the humoral and cellular immune responses in BALB/c mice immunized with the LIVP VACV strain, which was administered either by s.s. inoculation or i.d. injection into the same tail region of the animal. A virus dose of 105 pfu was used in both cases. ELISA of serum samples revealed no significant difference in the dynamics and level of production of VACV-specific IgM and IgG after i.d. or s.s. vaccination. A ELISpot analysis of splenocytes from the vaccinated mice showed that i.d. administration of VACV LIVP to mice induces a significantly greater T-cell immune response compared to s.s. inoculation. In order to assess the protective potency, on day 45 post immunization, mice were intranasally infected with lethal doses of either the cowpox virus (CPXV) or the ectromelia virus (ECTV), which is evolutionarily distant from the VACV and CPXV. Both vaccination techniques ensured complete protection of mice against infection with the CPXV. However, when mice were infected with a highly virulent strain of ECTV, 50% survived in the i.d. immunized group, whereas only 17% survived in the s.s. immunized group. It appears, therefore, that i.d. injection of the VACV can elicit a more potent protective immunity against orthopoxviruses compared to the conventional s.s. technique.
猴痘病毒感染于2022年开始在非洲以外的许多国家的人类中传播,这一情况正引起医学和科学界对迫切需要针对这种感染进行免疫接种的关注。根据现行指南,对于使用俄罗斯获批的基于痘苗病毒(VACV)LIVP株的第一代天花疫苗进行免疫接种的人群,应通过经皮接种(皮肤划痕,s.s.)来实施。然而,过去长期使用这种接种技术的经验表明,它不能足够可靠地确保病毒接种到患者皮肤中。皮内(i.d.)注射疫苗的方法可以作为s.s.接种的替代方案。皮内接种疫苗的有效性可能取决于病毒在身体上的注射部位。因此,本研究的目的是比较用LIVP VACV株免疫的BALB/c小鼠中,通过s.s.接种或i.d.注射到动物同一尾部区域后体液免疫和细胞免疫反应的发展情况。两种情况下均使用105 pfu的病毒剂量。血清样本的ELISA结果显示,i.d.接种或s.s.接种后,VACV特异性IgM和IgG的产生动态和水平没有显著差异。对接种疫苗小鼠的脾细胞进行ELISpot分析表明,与s.s.接种相比,给小鼠i.d.接种VACV LIVP可诱导显著更强的T细胞免疫反应。为了评估保护效力,在免疫后第45天,给小鼠鼻内接种致死剂量的牛痘病毒(CPXV)或埃可病毒(ECTV),ECTV在进化上与VACV和CPXV距离较远。两种接种技术都确保了小鼠完全免受CPXV感染。然而,当小鼠感染高毒力的ECTV株时,i.d.免疫组有50%存活,而s.s.免疫组只有17%存活。因此,与传统的s.s.技术相比,i.d.注射VACV似乎能引发更强的针对正痘病毒的保护性免疫。