Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Center for Infectious Disease Control, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Euro Surveill. 2022 Dec;27(48). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.48.2101064.
BackgroundEpidemics are a constant threat in the 21st century, particularly disease outbreaks following spillover of an animal virus to humans. Timeliness, a key metric in epidemic response, can be examined to identify critical steps and delays in public health action.AimTo examine timeliness, we analysed the response to the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, with a focus on the international and One Health response efforts.MethodsWe performed a historical review of the MERS epidemic between September 2012 and January 2019 in three steps: (i) the construction of a timeline identifying critical events in the global response, (ii) the performance of a critical path analysis to define outbreak milestones and (iii) a time gap analysis to measure timeliness in the execution of these milestones.ResultsWe proposed 14 MERS-specific milestones at different phases of the epidemic, assessing timeliness of the public health response as well as at the animal-human interface, where we identified the most significant delays.ConclusionsWhen comparing timeliness across three coronavirus epidemics, i.e. MERS (2012), SARS (2002) and COVID-19 (2019), we identified clear improvements over time for certain milestones including laboratory confirmation and diagnostics development, while this was not as apparent for others, as the identification of zoonotic hosts. To more efficiently respond to emerging threats, the global health community should widely assess and tackle specific delays in implementing response interventions by addressing challenges in the sharing of information, data and resources, as well as efficiency, quality, transparency and reliability of reporting events.
背景
在 21 世纪,传染病始终是一种威胁,尤其是动物病毒溢出感染人类后引发的疾病暴发。及时性是疫情应对的关键指标之一,通过对其进行分析,可以确定公共卫生行动中的关键步骤和延迟。
目的
为了考察及时性,我们对中东呼吸综合征(MERS)疫情的应对情况进行了分析,重点关注国际和“同一健康”应对措施。
方法
我们分三个步骤对 2012 年 9 月至 2019 年 1 月期间的 MERS 疫情进行了历史回顾:(i)构建时间表,确定全球应对措施中的关键事件;(ii)进行关键路径分析,定义疫情里程碑;(iii)进行时间间隔分析,衡量这些里程碑执行的及时性。
结果
我们提出了 14 个 MERS 特定的里程碑,分别在疫情的不同阶段评估公共卫生应对措施的及时性,以及在人畜共患病界面上的及时性,在该界面上我们发现了最显著的延迟。
结论
在对 3 种冠状病毒疫情(即 MERS(2012 年)、SARS(2002 年)和 COVID-19(2019 年))的及时性进行比较时,我们发现,在某些里程碑上,包括实验室确诊和诊断方法的开发,时间上有明显的改善,而在其他里程碑上,这种改善并不明显,比如确定人畜共患病宿主。为了更有效地应对新出现的威胁,全球卫生界应广泛评估并解决在实施应对措施方面的具体延迟问题,方法是解决信息、数据和资源共享方面的挑战,以及提高报告事件的效率、质量、透明度和可靠性。