Grande Francesco, Cesare Pozzan Mario, Mochi Zamperoli Edoardo, Gianoli Camilla Martina, Mollica Francesco, Catapano Santo
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758785. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
The aim of this study was to investigate by finite element method analysis the behaviour of a three-implant mandible Toronto framework made by three different materials, with two abutment systems and two loading conditions.
Three implants were virtually inserted in a mandible model in positions 3.6, 4.1, and 4.6. Three prosthetic framework bars with the same design and dimension (4.8 × 5.5 mm) were projected. The variables introduced in the computer model were the framework materials (glass fiber reinforced resin, Co-Cr, TiAl6V4), the abutment systems (Multi-Unit-Abutment [MUA]/OT-Bridge), and the loading conditions (500 N vertical load on all the framework area and 400 N on a 7-mm distal cantilever). The computer was programmed with physical properties of the materials as derived from the literature. Maximum tension and deformation values for each variable were registered at framework, screws, and abutment level and then compared.
Metal frameworks Cr-Co and TiAl6V4 resulted in lower deformation than glass fiber-reinforced resin frameworks while presenting higher tension values. The OT-Bridge exhibited lower maximum tension and deformation values than the MUA system. The first loading condition reached higher tension and deformation values than the second and it resulted in more uniformly distributed load on all the framework area, especially with the OT-Bridge system.
More rigid materials and OT-Bridge system decrease the deformation on the prosthetic components. Tension stresses are more uniformly distributed with glass fiber-reinforced resin, in the OT-Bridge system and avoiding cantilever loading.
本研究旨在通过有限元方法分析由三种不同材料制成、具有两种基台系统和两种加载条件的三种植入体下颌多伦多框架的性能。
在一个下颌骨模型中虚拟植入三种植入体,位置分别为3.6、4.1和4.6。设计并投影出三根具有相同设计和尺寸(4.8×5.5毫米)的修复框架杆。计算机模型中引入的变量包括框架材料(玻璃纤维增强树脂、钴铬合金、TiAl6V4)、基台系统(多单位基台[MUA]/OT桥)以及加载条件(在整个框架区域施加500牛垂直载荷,在7毫米远中悬臂上施加400牛载荷)。根据文献中得出的材料物理特性对计算机进行编程。记录每个变量在框架、螺钉和基台水平的最大张力和变形值,然后进行比较。
金属框架钴铬合金和TiAl6V4的变形比玻璃纤维增强树脂框架小,而张力值更高。OT桥的最大张力和变形值低于MUA系统。第一种加载条件下的张力和变形值高于第二种,并且在整个框架区域产生的载荷分布更均匀,尤其是在OT桥系统中。
更刚性的材料和OT桥系统可减少修复部件的变形。在OT桥系统中,使用玻璃纤维增强树脂并避免悬臂加载时,拉应力分布更均匀。