• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在“全口四植体”修复模式下,于OT桥系统中,在缺少一颗和两颗修复体螺丝的情况下,对循环加载后的预负荷损失进行评估。

Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an "All-on-Four" Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws.

作者信息

Pozzan Mario Cesare, Grande Francesco, Mochi Zamperoli Edoardo, Tesini Fabio, Carossa Massimo, Catapano Santo

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences CIR Dental School, University of Turin, Via Nizza 230, 10126 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 20;15(4):1582. doi: 10.3390/ma15041582.

DOI:10.3390/ma15041582
PMID:35208121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8879715/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of prosthetic screws after applying cyclic loadings in an "all-on-four" rehabilitation model with the OT Bridge system. The model was tested both with and without anterior screws. Four implant analogues following the "all-on-four" concept were inserted in an edentulous mandibular resin model. An OT Bridge system with a Cr-Co prosthetic framework was fabricated. Depending on the presence or absence of one or two anterior screws on the implant analogues, three groups were created, i.e., Gr.1: three tightening screws, Gr.2: two tightening screws, Control Group: four tightening screws. Each single group underwent subsequent 400,000 cyclic loads, simulating approximately a year of chewing by using a dynamometer machine. This cycle was repeated five times for each group, and preload loss values were evaluated on each prosthetic screw after each cycle. All the data obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student's -test. No statistically significant differences after intragroup analysis were found. A statistically significant difference within the Gr.1 between the screws in positions 33 and 36, equal to 15.2% (-value = 0.0176), was found. The OT Bridge seems a useful system to maintain the retention of a prosthesis during mechanical stress conditions even in the absence of one screw in an "all-on-four" rehabilitation. This could represent a good solution to solve the esthetic problem of the screw buccal access hole for fixed solutions.

摘要

本研究的目的是在采用OT Bridge系统的“全口四颗种植体”修复模型中,评估施加循环载荷后修复螺丝的稳定性。该模型在有或无前部螺丝的情况下均进行了测试。按照“全口四颗种植体”理念,将四颗种植体代型植入无牙下颌树脂模型中。制作了一个带有钴铬修复框架的OT Bridge系统。根据种植体代型上是否存在一颗或两颗前部螺丝,创建了三组,即:第1组:三颗紧固螺丝;第2组:两颗紧固螺丝;对照组:四颗紧固螺丝。每组均随后承受400,000次循环载荷,使用测力计模拟大约一年的咀嚼过程。每组重复此循环五次,并在每个循环后评估每个修复螺丝的预紧力损失值。对所有获得的数据进行单因素方差分析和学生t检验。组内分析未发现统计学上的显著差异。在第1组中,位置33和36的螺丝之间发现了统计学上的显著差异,等于15.2%(p值 = 0.0176)。OT Bridge似乎是一种有用的系统,即使在“全口四颗种植体”修复中缺少一颗螺丝的情况下,也能在机械应力条件下保持修复体的固位。这可能是解决固定修复中螺丝颊侧接入孔美学问题的一个好方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/f040e619372e/materials-15-01582-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/0f7c25d2da5b/materials-15-01582-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/9324c32c2aa5/materials-15-01582-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/ca0d295d4471/materials-15-01582-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/f040e619372e/materials-15-01582-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/0f7c25d2da5b/materials-15-01582-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/9324c32c2aa5/materials-15-01582-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/ca0d295d4471/materials-15-01582-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0656/8879715/f040e619372e/materials-15-01582-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Preload Loss after Cyclic Loading in the OT Bridge System in an "All-on-Four" Rehabilitation Model in the Absence of One and Two Prosthesis Screws.在“全口四植体”修复模式下,于OT桥系统中,在缺少一颗和两颗修复体螺丝的情况下,对循环加载后的预负荷损失进行评估。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 20;15(4):1582. doi: 10.3390/ma15041582.
2
Evaluation of prosthetic screw loosening in all-on-four implant-supported restorations with two different connection systems.采用两种不同连接系统的全口四颗种植体支持式修复体中修复螺丝松动情况的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1070-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体基台连接设计中预负荷损失的体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;15(4):1392. doi: 10.3390/ma15041392.
4
Clinical Assessment of Preload Maintenance in the Abutment Screws of Single Posterior Implants After 1 Month of Use.使用 1 个月后单颗后牙种植体基台螺钉的预载维持的临床评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):177-181. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8316.
5
Evaluation of Load Distribution in a Mandibular Model with Four Implants Depending on the Number of Prosthetic Screws Used for OT-Bridge System: A Finite Element Analysis (FEA).基于用于OT桥系统的修复螺钉数量对含四颗种植体的下颌骨模型中负荷分布的评估:有限元分析(FEA)
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;15(22):7963. doi: 10.3390/ma15227963.
6
Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.使用空气圆柱循环加载装置对种植体螺钉松动进行波形分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):402-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128099.
7
Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating.循环加载后通用基台螺钉的松动扭矩:拧紧技术和螺钉涂层的影响
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;7(5):375-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.375. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.在模拟咀嚼条件下,对种植支持式义齿施加再次扭矩后螺钉连接的稳定性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jun;111(6):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.024. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
9
Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.单颗种植体修复中三种不同基台螺钉的预紧力和扭矩去除评估
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):55-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100011.
10
The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.不同螺钉紧固技术对内连接种植体上部结构产生的应力的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1045-53.

引用本文的文献

1
OT Bridge prosthetic system with different number of screws in all on six maxillary prosthesis: finite element analysis.全口上颌六单位修复体中使用不同数量螺钉的OT桥修复系统:有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06199-5.
2
Finite Element Analysis of Functionally Loaded Subperiosteal Implants Evaluated on a Realistic Model Reproducing Severe Atrophic Jaws.在重现严重萎缩性颌骨的真实模型上评估功能负载骨膜下种植体的有限元分析
Methods Protoc. 2025 Jan 18;8(1):8. doi: 10.3390/mps8010008.
3
Immediate full-arch fixed rehabilitation of a narrow mandible with newly conceived connection system implants: A case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical behavior of atrophic maxillary restorations using the all-on-four concept and long trans-sinus implants: A finite element analysis.使用全口四颗种植体概念和长跨窦种植体的萎缩上颌修复体的生物力学行为:有限元分析。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021 Spring;15(2):106-110. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.018. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
1-Year Evaluation of OT Bridge Abutments for Immediately Loaded Maxillary Fixed Restorations: A Multicenter Study.用于即刻加载的上颌固定修复体的OT桥基牙1年评估:一项多中心研究
Eur J Dent. 2021 May;15(2):290-294. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716632. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Management of unfavorable implant positions and angulations in edentulous maxillae with different complete-arch fixed prosthetic designs: A case series and clinical guidelines.
采用新设计连接系统种植体对狭窄下颌骨进行即刻全牙弓固定修复:病例报告
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2024 Apr 28;16(1):64-71. doi: 10.34172/japid.2024.010. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of Tension and Deformation in a Mandibular Toronto Bridge Anchored on Three Fixtures Using Different Framework Materials, Abutment Systems, and Loading Conditions: A FEM Analysis.使用不同框架材料、基台系统和加载条件对锚固在三个种植体上的下颌多伦多桥的张力和变形进行评估:有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758785. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study.全数字化工作流程与传统印模制作的研磨全牙弓种植支持式框架的比较:一项临床研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;16(2):833. doi: 10.3390/ma16020833.
6
Can Abutment with Novel Superlattice CrN/NbN Coatings Influence Peri-Implant Tissue Health and Implant Survival Rate Compared to Machined Abutment? 6-Month Results from a Multi-Center Split-Mouth Randomized Control Trial.与机加工基台相比,具有新型超晶格CrN/NbN涂层的基台会影响种植体周围组织健康和种植体存活率吗?一项多中心双侧随机对照试验的6个月结果。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 27;16(1):246. doi: 10.3390/ma16010246.
7
Evaluation of Load Distribution in a Mandibular Model with Four Implants Depending on the Number of Prosthetic Screws Used for OT-Bridge System: A Finite Element Analysis (FEA).基于用于OT桥系统的修复螺钉数量对含四颗种植体的下颌骨模型中负荷分布的评估:有限元分析(FEA)
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;15(22):7963. doi: 10.3390/ma15227963.
8
Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using Trans-Mucosal Tissue-Level Implants with and without Implant-Abutment Units: A Case Report.使用带和不带种植体基台单元的经黏膜组织水平种植体进行全牙弓修复:病例报告
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;10(7):116. doi: 10.3390/dj10070116.
9
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Novel Triangular Implant Neck Design: A Case Series.新型三角形种植体颈部设计的临床与影像学评估:病例系列
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;10(6):113. doi: 10.3390/dj10060113.
10
Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.钛及钛锆或氧化锆牙科种植体的临床性能比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):83. doi: 10.3390/dj10050083.
不同全牙弓固定修复设计对无牙上颌骨种植体位置及角度不良的处理:病例系列及临床指南
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Computer-Aided Rehabilitation Supported by Zygomatic Implants: A Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic with Oncologic Patients after Five Years of Follow-Up.颧骨种植体支持的计算机辅助康复:一项对萎缩性患者和肿瘤患者进行五年随访后的队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3254. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103254.
5
FEM Analysis Applied to OT Bridge Abutment with Seeger Retention System.应用于采用西格固定系统的口腔种植桥基牙的有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):47-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715550. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
6
Three-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of the Malar Bone Engagement Available for Ideal Zygomatic Implant Placement.用于理想颧骨种植体植入的颧骨骨结合的三维影像学评估
Methods Protoc. 2020 Jul 22;3(3):52. doi: 10.3390/mps3030052.
7
Complications of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported full-arch restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.螺钉和粘结剂固位的种植体支持全颌修复体并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(1):11-40.
8
Effect of the attachment system on the biomechanical and clinical performance of overdentures: A systematic review.附着体系统对覆盖义齿生物力学和临床性能的影响:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):589-594. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Implant-supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in fully edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part II.种植体支持的悬臂固定义齿修复在全口无牙患者中的应用:文献系统评价。第二部分。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:275-294. doi: 10.1111/clr.13310.
10
Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.牙种植体中导致预负荷丧失的因素的系统分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):189-195. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_294_17.