影响高级实践护士循证实践中研究文章批判性评价的因素：一项描述性定性研究。
Factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in Evidence-Based practices by advanced practice nurses: A descriptive qualitative study.
机构信息
Faculty of Nursing, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Nursing Systems Management, Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
出版信息
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3719-3727. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1628. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
AIM
To describe factors affecting critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practice by certified nurse specialists who were advanced practice nurses in Japan.
DESIGN
A descriptive qualitative study.
METHODS
Fourteen certified nurse specialists with master's degree were included by a snowball sampling to maximize the variety of specialty fields for advanced practice nurses in Japan. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2016 and March 2017. Interview guides included the experience of evidence-based practice and learning about critical appraisal.
RESULTS
The following four aspects were identified as factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practices-individual beliefs and attitude, learning status, organizational readiness and availability of research evidence. Each factor included both positive and negative aspects for critical appraisal in evidence-based practice.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
If advanced practice nurses acquire knowledge/skills of critical appraisal, they would be able to select more appropriate care. This will increase to improve the health-related outcome for patients or populations.
目的
描述日本注册护士专家（高级实践护士）在循证实践中评价研究文章的影响因素。
设计
描述性定性研究。
方法
通过滚雪球抽样选取 14 名具有硕士学位的注册护士专家，以最大限度地涵盖日本高级实践护士的专业领域多样性。2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 3 月期间进行了个体半结构式访谈。访谈指南包括循证实践经验和了解批判性评价。
结果
确定了影响循证实践中研究文章批判性评价的四个方面——个人信念和态度、学习状况、组织准备情况和研究证据的可获得性。每个因素都包括循证实践批判性评价的正反两方面。
患者或公众的贡献
如果高级实践护士获得了批判性评价的知识/技能，他们将能够选择更合适的护理。这将有助于改善患者或人群的健康相关结局。
Zotero 插件