文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

不同失语症类型的中风后个体的注意力转换缺陷

Switching attention deficits in post-stroke individuals with different aphasia types.

作者信息

Kuptsova Svetlana V, Dragoy Olga V, Ivanova Maria V

机构信息

Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia.

HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2023;37(2):260-287. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.2002804. Epub 2021 Nov 29.


DOI:10.1080/02687038.2021.2002804
PMID:36699113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that individuals with aphasia have impairments in switching attention compared to healthy controls. However, there is insufficient information about the characteristics of switching attention within one task and whether attention deficits vary depending on aphasia type and lesion location. We aimed to address these knowledge gaps by investigating characteristics of switching attention within one type of task in participants with different types of aphasia and distinct lesion sites. METHOD: Forty individuals with post-stroke aphasia (20 with non-fluent aphasia and frontal lobe damage, and 20 with fluent aphasia and temporal lobe damage) and 20 neurologically healthy age-matched individuals performed an attention switching task. They listened to sequences of high-pitched and low-pitched tones that were presented to them one by one, tallied them separately, and, at the end of each sequence, had to say how many high- and low-pitched tones they had heard. RESULTS: Participants with aphasia performed significantly worse on the task compared to healthy controls, and the performance of two aphasia groups also differed. Specifically, individuals with both aphasia types made more errors than healthy individuals, and the participants with non-fluent aphasia responded more slowly than controls, while reaction times of the participants with fluent aphasia did not differ significantly from those of controls. Also, the two groups of participants with aphasia differed significantly in accuracy, with individuals in the non-fluent group making more errors. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrated that people with different types of aphasia have distinct impairments in switching attention. Since cognitive deficits impact language performance, this information is important for differentially addressing their language problems and selecting more specific and optimal rehabilitation programs that target different underlying mechanisms.

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,与健康对照组相比,失语症患者在注意力转换方面存在障碍。然而,关于在一项任务中注意力转换的特征以及注意力缺陷是否因失语症类型和病变位置而异的信息不足。我们旨在通过研究不同类型失语症和不同病变部位的参与者在一种任务类型中的注意力转换特征来填补这些知识空白。 方法:40名中风后失语症患者(20名非流利性失语症且额叶受损,20名流利性失语症且颞叶受损)和20名年龄匹配的神经功能正常个体进行了一项注意力转换任务。他们听取逐一呈现给他们的高音和低音序列,分别对其进行计数,并且在每个序列结束时,必须说出他们听到的高音和低音的数量。 结果:与健康对照组相比,失语症患者在该任务上的表现明显更差,并且两个失语症组的表现也有所不同。具体而言,两种失语症类型的个体比健康个体犯的错误更多,非流利性失语症患者的反应比对照组更慢,而流利性失语症患者的反应时间与对照组没有显著差异。此外,两组失语症患者在准确性方面存在显著差异,非流利性组的个体犯的错误更多。 结论:数据表明,不同类型的失语症患者在注意力转换方面存在明显的障碍。由于认知缺陷会影响语言表现,因此该信息对于差异化解决他们的语言问题以及选择针对不同潜在机制的更具体和最佳的康复方案非常重要。

相似文献

[1]
Switching attention deficits in post-stroke individuals with different aphasia types.

Aphasiology. 2023

[2]
Treatment of word-finding deficits in fluent aphasia through the manipulation of spatial attention: Preliminary findings.

Aphasiology. 2007-1

[3]
Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.

Neuropsychologia. 2022-8-13

[4]
Characteristics of Non-linguistic Cognitive Impairment in Post-stroke Aphasia Patients.

Front Neurol. 2020-9-30

[5]
Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia.

Brain. 2013-10-15

[6]
Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners' Continuous Performance Test - 2nd edition.

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018-4-18

[7]
Processing lexical ambiguity in sentential context: Eye-tracking data from brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged individuals.

Neuropsychologia. 2014-11

[8]
Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke.

Brain. 2013-10-24

[9]
The trouble with nouns and verbs in Greek fluent aphasia.

J Commun Disord. 2008

[10]
Intensive aphasia therapy improves low mood in fluent post-stroke aphasia: Evidence from a case-controlled study.

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Unveiling Cognitive Interference: fNIRS Insights Into Poststroke Aphasia During Stroop Tasks.

Neural Plast. 2025-3-31

[2]
Attention to attention in aphasia - elucidating impairment patterns, modality differences and neural correlates.

Neuropsychologia. 2022-12-15

本文引用的文献

[1]
Characteristics of Non-linguistic Cognitive Impairment in Post-stroke Aphasia Patients.

Front Neurol. 2020-9-30

[2]
Evaluating informative content and global coherence in fluent and non-fluent aphasia.

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019-10-10

[3]
Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

Brain. 2019-10-1

[4]
Covariation of intraindividual variability in cognitive speed and cognitive performance across young, middle, and older adulthood.

Dev Psychol. 2019-1-28

[5]
Neural mechanisms of two different verbal working memory tasks: A VLSM study.

Neuropsychologia. 2018-3-8

[6]
Between-session and within-session intra-individual variability in attention in aphasia.

Neuropsychologia. 2017-12-6

[7]
[FMRI study of visual task switching in healthy individuals].

Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2015

[8]
A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm.

J Commun Disord. 2015

[9]
Processing lexical ambiguity in sentential context: Eye-tracking data from brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged individuals.

Neuropsychologia. 2014-11

[10]
Lesion correlates of patholinguistic profiles in chronic aphasia: comparisons of syndrome-, modality- and symptom-level assessment.

Brain. 2014-2-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索