Suppr超能文献

C2穹窿状椎板切除术与C2部分椎板切除术治疗上颈椎后纵韧带骨化的比较

Comparison of C2 dome-like laminectomy with C2 partial laminectomy for upper cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

作者信息

Miao Dazhuang, Gao Xianda, Zhen Zihao, Yang Dalong, Wang Hui, Ding Wenyuan

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 9;9:1087157. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1087157. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes of C2 dome-like laminectomy with C2 partial laminectomy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) up to the C2 level and above.

METHODS

32 patients underwent surgical treatment for OPLL up to C2 and were divided into: C2 dome-like laminectomy group (C2-DOM group,  = 16) and C2 partial laminectomy group (C2-PL group,  = 16). The cervical curvature (CCI), dura width at C2/3, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, recovery rate (RR), neck disability index (NDI) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were evaluated and compared preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

The JOA score and NDI significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative dura width at C2/3 and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, dura width at C2/3 in the C2-PL group was significantly larger than the C2-DOM group, while the VAS of C2-DOM group was significantly lower than C2-PL group. The CCI in both groups decreased compared with before surgery, and there was no significant difference in CCI between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

C2-DOM is less demolitive and reduces postoperative neck pain, while C2-PL can achieve more adequate decompression without increasing the risk of postoperative cervical kyphosis.

摘要

目的

比较C2穹顶状椎板切除术与C2部分椎板切除术治疗C2及以上节段后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者的手术效果。

方法

32例C2及以上节段OPLL患者接受手术治疗,分为:C2穹顶状椎板切除术组(C2-DOM组,n = 16)和C2部分椎板切除术组(C2-PL组,n = 16)。评估并比较术前及术后1个月、3个月、6个月、1年及此后每年的颈椎曲度(CCI)、C2/3节段硬脊膜宽度、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、恢复率(RR)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。

结果

两组末次随访时JOA评分和NDI均显著改善,组间无显著差异。两组术前C2/3节段硬脊膜宽度和VAS无显著差异。末次随访时,C2-PL组C2/3节段硬脊膜宽度显著大于C2-DOM组,而C2-DOM组VAS显著低于C2-PL组。两组CCI均较术前降低,两组间CCI无显著差异。

结论

C2-DOM破坏性较小,可减轻术后颈部疼痛,而C2-PL可实现更充分的减压,且不增加术后颈椎后凸风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7818/9869379/1a57c27bc797/fsurg-09-1087157-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验