Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 26;66(1):e22. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.3.
Coercive measures (such as seclusion, mechanical restraint, and forced medication) during psychiatric inpatient treatment should be avoided whenever possible. Different interventions were already developed to reduce coercion, but for their effective application, it is crucial to know the risk factors of individuals and clinical situations that might be associated with coercion. Since the results of previous studies differ considerably the current study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the course of the exertion of coercion in detail.
In this study, we analyzed clinical, procedural, and sociodemographic data from patients ( = 16,607 cases) who were treated as inpatients in Switzerland's largest psychiatric institution with 320 beds during the years 2017 to 2020. We used regression models to identify predictors for the exertion of coercion, the number of coercive measures during a treatment episode and time until exertion of the first and last coercive measure.
Coercive measures are mostly used during the first days of treatment. We identified clinical parameters such as manic or psychotic episodes to be the most relevant predictors for the exertion of coercion. Cases with those disorders also received coercion more often and earlier in their treatment course than other diagnostic groups. Other promoting factors for frequency and early application of coercion were involuntary admission and factors of chronicity and clinical severity.
Knowing the risk factors may help to target preventive strategies for those at highest risk. In particular, interventions should focus on the critical timeframe at the beginning of treatment.
在精神病住院治疗期间,应尽可能避免使用强制性措施(如隔离、机械约束和强制用药)。已经开发了不同的干预措施来减少强制,但为了有效应用,了解可能与强制相关的个体风险因素和临床情况至关重要。由于先前研究的结果差异很大,本研究旨在通过详细评估强制实施的过程来填补这一空白。
在这项研究中,我们分析了 2017 年至 2020 年间在瑞士最大的拥有 320 张床位的精神病院接受住院治疗的患者(=16607 例)的临床、程序和社会人口统计学数据。我们使用回归模型来确定实施强制的预测因素、治疗期间强制措施的数量以及实施第一和最后一次强制措施的时间。
强制措施主要在治疗的最初几天使用。我们发现,临床参数,如躁狂或精神病发作,是实施强制的最相关预测因素。患有这些疾病的病例比其他诊断组更早、更频繁地接受强制治疗。强制性和早期应用的其他促进因素包括非自愿入院以及慢性和临床严重程度的因素。
了解风险因素可能有助于针对高风险人群制定预防策略。特别是,干预措施应侧重于治疗开始时的关键时间段。