成年人在闲暇时间内达到有氧运动、肌肉强化和综合体力活动指导方针的比例,按城乡分类和地区划分-美国,2020 年。

Prevalence of Meeting Aerobic, Muscle-Strengthening, and Combined Physical Activity Guidelines During Leisure Time Among Adults, by Rural-Urban Classification and Region - United States, 2020.

出版信息

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Jan 27;72(4):85-89. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7204a1.

Abstract

The healthful effects of physical activity on a multitude of physical and mental health outcomes are well documented (1). Despite promising increases in the percentage of U.S. adults meeting aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity guidelines (guidelines)* (1) during leisure time in nearly all demographic and regional subgroups 1998-2018 (2,3), differences by rurality and U.S. Census Bureau region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West), persist (4). Before 2020, analyses of rural-urban differences were dichotomized into nonmetropolitan (rural) versus metropolitan (urban) areas; however, in 2020 a four-category rural-urban variable to classify rural-urban status was included in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) public-use dataset. NHIS 2020 data were used to conduct multivariate logistic regression analyses by rural-urban status and U.S. Census Bureau region of the prevalence of meeting the aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and combined aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines during leisure time among adults aged ≥18 years, controlling for demographic characteristics. Prevalence of meeting the aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and combined aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines was consistently the lowest in Nonmetropolitan counties (38.2%, 21.1%, and 16.1%, respectively) and highest in the West region (52.1%, 35.3%, and 28.5%, respectively). Regardless of rural-urban classification and region, no more than 28% of adults met combined aerobic and muscle-strengthening guidelines. Adults in the most rural category were significantly less likely to meet aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and combined guidelines than were adults in each of the three other categories (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] range = 0.68-0.89). In addition, adults in medium and small metropolitan counties were less likely to meet guidelines than were adults in the two most urban categories (aOR range = 0.85-0.89). Adults in the Northeast, Midwest, and South U.S. Census Bureau regions were less likely to meet guidelines than were adults in the West region (aOR range = 0.75-0.82). These analyses identify geographic disparities in leisure-time physical activity where focused population-level intervention efforts could help reduce or eliminate the consequent disparities in chronic conditions (e.g., cardiovascular diseases) and the resulting mortality (5,6).

摘要

体育活动对众多身心健康结果的有益影响已有充分记录(1)。尽管 1998-2018 年期间,美国成年人在闲暇时间内符合有氧运动和肌肉强化运动指南(指南)*(1)的比例有了可喜的增长(1),但在几乎所有人口统计学和地区亚组中(2,3),农村和城市地区以及美国人口普查局地区(东北部、中西部、南部和西部)之间仍然存在差异(4)。在 2020 年之前,农村与城市差异的分析分为非大都市(农村)与大都市(城市)地区;然而,2020 年,国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)公共使用数据集纳入了一个四分类农村-城市变量来分类农村-城市地位。利用 2020 年 NHIS 数据,按农村-城市地位和美国人口普查局地区,对 18 岁及以上成年人在闲暇时间内符合有氧运动、肌肉强化和有氧运动与肌肉强化相结合指南的流行情况进行多变量逻辑回归分析,控制人口统计学特征。在非大都市县(分别为 38.2%、21.1%和 16.1%),符合有氧运动、肌肉强化和有氧运动与肌肉强化相结合指南的比例最低,而在西部地区(分别为 52.1%、35.3%和 28.5%)最高。无论农村-城市分类和地区如何,只有不到 28%的成年人符合有氧运动和肌肉强化相结合的指南。最农村地区的成年人与其他三个地区的成年人相比,明显不太可能符合有氧运动、肌肉强化和结合指南(调整后的优势比[aOR]范围=0.68-0.89)。此外,中、小都市县的成年人比两个最城市化的类别中的成年人更不可能符合指南(aOR 范围=0.85-0.89)。美国东北部、中西部和南部人口普查局地区的成年人比西部地区的成年人更不可能符合指南(aOR 范围=0.75-0.82)。这些分析确定了休闲时间体育活动中的地理差异,有针对性的人群水平干预措施可以帮助减少或消除由此导致的慢性疾病(如心血管疾病)和由此导致的死亡率方面的差异(5,6)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索