Suppr超能文献

细胞溶解性阴道炎文献的范围综述。

Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280954. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytolytic vaginosis (CV) is a little-known, controversial condition that is typically not considered for women presenting with vulvovaginitis symptoms. Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and compile the global evidence on CV.

METHODS

A medical librarian searched Prospero, Wiley Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, EBSCO CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Scopus, from inception to April 4, 2019 and updated to October 17, 2021. Studies were eligible if they discussed CV. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection and data extraction.

RESULTS

Sixty-four studies were identified, with 67% of studies (n = 43) published since 2007. Studies were from around the world, including the United States (28%, n = 18), Brazil (11%, n = 7), Portugal (11%, n = 7), and China (11%, n = 7). Fifty percent of studies (n = 32) were reviews; the remainder were observational; and of these, 78% (n = 25) were cross-sectional. The most frequent topics included: diagnosis (19%, n = 12), prevalence (17%, n = 11), and overview of CV (50%, n = 32). Evidence for prevalence in symptomatic women (median prevalence of 5%, interquartile range 3%-8%) was based only on 16% of studies (n = 10) with minimal evidence on prevalence in asymptomatic women and across different geographic regions. Microbiological findings, including abundant lactobacilli and fragmented epithelial cells, were found useful to distinguish between CV and vulvovaginal candidiasis, and Lactobacillus crispatus was noted to dominate the vaginal flora in women with CV. Most studies used subjective criteria to diagnose CV as the condition lacks gold-standard microscopic criteria. The suggested primary treatment (baking soda irrigations) was largely based on expert opinion, and there was minimal evidence on associations between CV and other conditions.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge gaps currently exist in all realms of CV research. Additional research is needed to confirm the validity of CV and ensure that women are diagnosed and treated effectively.

摘要

背景

细胞溶解性阴道炎(CV)是一种鲜为人知且存在争议的病症,通常不被认为是引起女性出现外阴阴道炎症状的原因。目的:本综述旨在对全球范围内关于 CV 的证据进行识别和整理。

方法

一名医学图书管理员从 Prospe-ro 开始,在 2019 年 4 月 4 日之前在 Wiley Cochrane 图书馆、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、EBSCO CINAHL、ProQuest 学位论文和全球论文、Scopus 进行了检索,并于 2021 年 10 月 17 日进行了更新。如果研究讨论了 CV,则符合入选标准。两名独立的评审员进行了研究选择和数据提取。

结果

共确定了 64 项研究,其中 67%(n=43)的研究发表于 2007 年之后。这些研究来自世界各地,包括美国(28%,n=18)、巴西(11%,n=7)、葡萄牙(11%,n=7)和中国(11%,n=7)。50%的研究(n=32)为综述,其余为观察性研究;其中 78%(n=25)为横断面研究。最常见的主题包括:诊断(19%,n=12)、患病率(17%,n=11)和 CV 概述(50%,n=32)。有关有症状女性患病率的证据(中位数患病率为 5%,四分位间距为 3%-8%)仅基于 16%的研究(n=10),关于无症状女性和不同地理区域患病率的证据很少。大量乳酸杆菌和破碎的上皮细胞等微生物学发现有助于区分 CV 和外阴阴道念珠菌病,并且在患有 CV 的女性中,阴道菌群以乳酸杆菌脆杆菌为主。大多数研究使用主观标准来诊断 CV,因为该病症缺乏金标准的显微镜标准。建议的主要治疗方法(小苏打冲洗)主要基于专家意见,并且关于 CV 与其他疾病之间的关联的证据很少。

结论

目前 CV 研究的所有领域都存在知识空白。需要进一步研究来确认 CV 的有效性,并确保女性得到有效诊断和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21fa/9879469/ee46200f9028/pone.0280954.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验