Suppr超能文献

使用新鲜人唾液检测四种根管封闭剂的细菌渗漏情况

Bacterial Leakage of Four Endodontic Sealers Using Fresh Human Saliva.

作者信息

Tour Savadkouhi Sohrab, Roghanizad Nasrin, Aghabeigi Mina, Sangchouli Sima, Khajavi Faezeh, Khalilak Zohreh

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dentist, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2020 Spring;15(2):106-110. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i2.28089.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial leakage plays a considerable role in endodontic related failures. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial leakage of bioceramic (including Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex) and resin-based root canal sealers (naming AH-Plus and AdSeal).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were included in this experimental study. These were randomly allocated into four experimental groups, which were obturated with gutta-percha and four different sealers (=15), and the two control groups (positive, =4 and negative, =4). A dual-chamber technique was carried out using fresh human saliva and traced for 90 days. The Chi-square and Long Rank tests were performed for data analysis.

RESULTS

Bacterial leakage was observed in 33.3% of the samples in Well Root ST, 40% in AH-Plus group, 53.3% in AdSeal group, and 66.6% in MTA Fillapex group. The difference between the Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex groups was significant (=0.02). The mean leakage time between the Well Root ST (85.6 days) and MTA Fillapex groups (71.2 days) was also significant (=0.037).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed bacterial leakage in all experimental groups. The Well Root ST and the MTA Fillapex groups showed the lowest and highest bacterial leakages, respectively. Then it seems that the Well Root ST is a good substitute for MTA Fillapex in clinical applications.

摘要

引言

细菌渗漏在牙髓病相关的治疗失败中起着相当重要的作用。本研究的目的是比较生物陶瓷类(包括Well Root ST和MTA Fillapex)和树脂类根管封闭剂(AH-Plus和AdSeal)的细菌渗漏情况。

方法和材料

本实验研究纳入了68颗上颌中切牙。将其随机分为四个实验组,每组用牙胶尖和四种不同的封闭剂进行充填(每组15颗),以及两个对照组(阳性对照组4颗,阴性对照组4颗)。采用双腔技术,使用新鲜人唾液进行追踪,为期90天。数据分析采用卡方检验和长秩检验。

结果

Well Root ST组33.3%的样本出现细菌渗漏,AH-Plus组为40%,AdSeal组为53.3%,MTA Fillapex组为66.6%。Well Root ST组和MTA Fillapex组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。Well Root ST组(85.6天)和MTA Fillapex组(71.2天)的平均渗漏时间差异也具有统计学意义(P = 0.037)。

结论

本研究结果显示所有实验组均出现了细菌渗漏。Well Root ST组和MTA Fillapex组的细菌渗漏率分别最低和最高。因此,在临床应用中,Well Root ST似乎是MTA Fillapex的良好替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4cf/9709839/e731c9f317c2/IEJ-15-106-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验