Tour Savadkouhi Sohrab, Roghanizad Nasrin, Aghabeigi Mina, Sangchouli Sima, Khajavi Faezeh, Khalilak Zohreh
Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dentist, Tehran, Iran.
Iran Endod J. 2020 Spring;15(2):106-110. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i2.28089.
Bacterial leakage plays a considerable role in endodontic related failures. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial leakage of bioceramic (including Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex) and resin-based root canal sealers (naming AH-Plus and AdSeal).
Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were included in this experimental study. These were randomly allocated into four experimental groups, which were obturated with gutta-percha and four different sealers (=15), and the two control groups (positive, =4 and negative, =4). A dual-chamber technique was carried out using fresh human saliva and traced for 90 days. The Chi-square and Long Rank tests were performed for data analysis.
Bacterial leakage was observed in 33.3% of the samples in Well Root ST, 40% in AH-Plus group, 53.3% in AdSeal group, and 66.6% in MTA Fillapex group. The difference between the Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex groups was significant (=0.02). The mean leakage time between the Well Root ST (85.6 days) and MTA Fillapex groups (71.2 days) was also significant (=0.037).
The results of this study revealed bacterial leakage in all experimental groups. The Well Root ST and the MTA Fillapex groups showed the lowest and highest bacterial leakages, respectively. Then it seems that the Well Root ST is a good substitute for MTA Fillapex in clinical applications.
细菌渗漏在牙髓病相关的治疗失败中起着相当重要的作用。本研究的目的是比较生物陶瓷类(包括Well Root ST和MTA Fillapex)和树脂类根管封闭剂(AH-Plus和AdSeal)的细菌渗漏情况。
本实验研究纳入了68颗上颌中切牙。将其随机分为四个实验组,每组用牙胶尖和四种不同的封闭剂进行充填(每组15颗),以及两个对照组(阳性对照组4颗,阴性对照组4颗)。采用双腔技术,使用新鲜人唾液进行追踪,为期90天。数据分析采用卡方检验和长秩检验。
Well Root ST组33.3%的样本出现细菌渗漏,AH-Plus组为40%,AdSeal组为53.3%,MTA Fillapex组为66.6%。Well Root ST组和MTA Fillapex组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。Well Root ST组(85.6天)和MTA Fillapex组(71.2天)的平均渗漏时间差异也具有统计学意义(P = 0.037)。
本研究结果显示所有实验组均出现了细菌渗漏。Well Root ST组和MTA Fillapex组的细菌渗漏率分别最低和最高。因此,在临床应用中,Well Root ST似乎是MTA Fillapex的良好替代品。