• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即使在一个提倡机会均等的学校体系中,相对年龄效应也会改变学生对教育路径的选择。

The relative age effect shifts students' choice of educational track even within a school system promoting equal opportunities.

作者信息

Oterhals Geir, Bachmann Kari Elisabeth, Bjerke Annette Hessen, Pedersen Arve Vorland

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.

Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Education, Volda University College, Volda, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1066264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066264. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066264
PMID:36704699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9871899/
Abstract

In most education systems, the age of a given cohort of students spans up to 12 months, which creates a within-class age difference, or , that tends to disadvantage younger students. Because birth month indeed correlates with academic performance, with poorer outcomes for students born later in the year, the effect can have lifelong consequences for students, whose academic performance justifies their acceptance into different educational tracks. Although past studies have identified the relative age effect in students' choice of educational track in school systems in which students make such choices at the age of 10-14 years, we examined data from the Norwegian school system, in which education tracks are chosen at the age of 15-16 years. The dataset included the variables birth month, track choice, and gender, of all 28,231 pupils at the upper secondary school level in a school county in Norway. Birth month was compared between vocational and academic track choices and the results revealed a significant relative age effect on educational choices between academic and vocational tracks, such that younger students were significantly more likely to apply for vocational tracks. The effect was significantly stronger for boys compared to girls. This indicates that the choice of educational track may reflect students' relative age, especially among boys, and hence, not be based on interests alone. Those findings have implications for actors involved in ensuring equity in education systems in Norway and elsewhere.

摘要

在大多数教育体系中,特定一批学生的年龄跨度可达12个月,这就造成了班级内的年龄差异,即年龄差,而这往往会使年龄较小的学生处于不利地位。由于出生月份确实与学业成绩相关,下半年出生的学生成绩较差,这种影响可能会对学生产生终身后果,因为他们的学业成绩决定了他们进入不同教育轨道的机会。尽管过去的研究已经在学生10至14岁时做出此类选择的学校系统中,确定了学生在选择教育轨道时的相对年龄效应,但我们研究了挪威学校系统的数据,在该系统中,教育轨道是在15至16岁时选择的。数据集包括挪威一个学区所有28231名高中生的出生月份、轨道选择和性别变量。对职业轨道和学术轨道选择的出生月份进行了比较,结果显示在学术轨道和职业轨道的教育选择上存在显著的相对年龄效应,即年龄较小的学生申请职业轨道的可能性显著更高。与女孩相比,男孩的这种效应明显更强。这表明教育轨道的选择可能反映了学生的相对年龄,尤其是在男孩中,因此,不仅仅是基于兴趣。这些发现对挪威和其他地方参与确保教育系统公平的相关方具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc49/9871899/03bd80d014e0/fpsyg-13-1066264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc49/9871899/03bd80d014e0/fpsyg-13-1066264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc49/9871899/03bd80d014e0/fpsyg-13-1066264-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The relative age effect shifts students' choice of educational track even within a school system promoting equal opportunities.即使在一个提倡机会均等的学校体系中,相对年龄效应也会改变学生对教育路径的选择。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1066264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066264. eCollection 2022.
2
Gendered pathways in school burnout among adolescents.青少年学校倦怠的性别化路径。
J Adolesc. 2012 Aug;35(4):929-39. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
3
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
4
RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success-But do they already matter for educational track choices?职业兴趣 RIASEC 与大五人格特质对生活成功很重要——但它们对教育轨道的选择是否已经很重要?
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):1007-1024. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12547. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
5
General or Vocational Education? The Role of Vocational Interests in Educational Decisions at the End of Compulsory School in Switzerland.普通教育还是职业教育?职业兴趣在瑞士义务教育结束时教育决策中的作用。
Vocat Learn. 2021;14(1):115-145. doi: 10.1007/s12186-020-09256-y. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
6
Health and educational aspirations in adolescence: a longitudinal study in Finland.青少年时期的健康与教育抱负:芬兰的一项纵向研究
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7824-8.
7
Effortless or less effort? Effects of tracks on students' engagement.不费力还是少费力?轨道对学生参与度的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 May;90(2):487-516. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12290. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
Disentangling the interplay of the sense of belonging and institutional channels in individuals' educational trajectories.厘清个体教育轨迹中归属感与制度渠道之间的相互作用。
Dev Psychol. 2023 Jan;59(1):30-42. doi: 10.1037/dev0001448. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
10
Poorer self-reported mental health and general health among first year upper secondary school students do not predict school dropout: a five-year prospective study.高中一年级学生自我报告的较差心理健康和总体健康状况并不能预测辍学:一项为期五年的前瞻性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 8;15:1304314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304314. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
40-years of relative age effects: life is not fair!40年的相对年龄效应:生活并不公平!
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Feb 4;6:1516173. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1516173. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in the constituent year effect in Junior World Championships in alpine skiing: A window into relative development effects?高山滑雪少年世界锦标赛中组成年效应的变化:了解相对发展效应的窗口?
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0231384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231384. eCollection 2020.
2
Association of Relative Age in the School Year With Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Depression.学年中的相对年龄与智力残疾、注意力缺陷/多动障碍和抑郁症诊断之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Nov 1;173(11):1068-1075. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3194.
3
A Population Study of Relative Age Effects on National Tests in Reading Literacy.
一项关于阅读素养国家测试中相对年龄效应的人群研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01761. eCollection 2019.
4
Relative Age Effects and Gender Differences in the National Test of Numeracy: A Population Study of Norwegian Children.挪威儿童全国算术测试中的相对年龄效应与性别差异:一项人口研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 2;9:1091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01091. eCollection 2018.
5
The relative age effect reversal among the National Hockey League elite.国家冰球联盟精英球员中的相对年龄效应逆转。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182827. eCollection 2017.
6
The impact of physical growth and relative age effect on assessment in physical education.身体发育和相对年龄效应在体育教育评估中的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 May;17(4):482-487. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1268651. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
7
Teacher (Mis)Perceptions of Preschoolers' Academic Skills: Predictors and Associations With Longitudinal Outcomes.教师对学龄前儿童学业技能的(错误)认知:预测因素及与纵向结果的关联
J Educ Psychol. 2015 Aug 1;107(3):805-820. doi: 10.1037/edu0000008. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
[Growth references for Norwegian children].[挪威儿童的生长参考标准]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Feb 12;129(4):281-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.32473.
9
Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies.教师期望与自我实现预言:已知与未知、已解决与未解决的争议。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(2):131-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3.