Replacing conventional telecommunication with a freeform HIPAA compliant healthcare texting app: a survey of patient preference.

BACKGROUND

The ability to effectively communicate with patients continues to be a challenge for physician offices. Mobile healthcare applications have enhanced the accessibility of healthcare providers to their patients. However, the efficacy of unrestricted, personalized, bidirectional, freeform texting has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

We investigated patient preference and self-reported outcomes using a smartphone HIPAA compliant mobile healthcare texting app, compared to conventional telecommunication, in self-reported quality of care, and impact on preventing unnecessary emergency department visits. A retrospective cohort survey study of a single-surgeon hernia specialist's practice was utilized. Patients with access to a smartphone who received care between July 2017 and March 2020 were instructed to utilize the healthcare texting app as a replacement to calling/receiving calls from the physician's office. Messages to and from patients were delivered directly to their surgeon and the surgical team via non-automated, personalized, freeform text messages, and templates, available to patients at all hours of the day. A depersonalized online survey was then distributed to assess patient perceived quality of care using the app, compared to their past experiences calling physician offices, and whether they preferred using text or conventional telecommunication. Additional statistics were reported using the application's built-in software, including response times, adoption rates, and message volumes.

RESULTS

90 patients successfully completed the entirety of the survey, median age range 50-60 years old. 97% of respondents reported the texting app provided at least non-inferior quality of care compared to conventional telecommunication, with a majority (75%) experiencing a relatively improved quality of care. 9% reported an unnecessary ED visit being avoided after consulting their physician through the application.

CONCLUSIONS

Unrestricted, freeform, non-automated communication via texting may be preferred by patients over conventional telecommunication. However, further research is warranted to assess the external validity and clinical impact of such results.