Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Community Engagement Program, Boston University Clinical Translational Science Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr;16(4):557-563. doi: 10.1111/cts.13478. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
The benefits of community-engaged research (CEnR) have been documented in the literature. However, the adoption of community engaged (CE) and participatory approaches among health researchers remains limited. The Boston University (BU) Clinical Translational Science Institute's community engagement program initiated a discussion among five BU Deans to explore their approaches to support the practice of CEnR among faculty in their schools. The discussion was recorded and the transcript analyzed to identify and explore themes that emerged. Most strategies discussed by the Deans were not focused on changing institutional systems to advance CEnR. Instead, the analyses showed that institutional CE efforts highlighted by the Deans were focused on "responsibility centered on one person" or "research mentors." Approaches to developing a culture of CEnR that centers responsibility for promoting it on a few people in a university may place significant burden on leadership and researchers and is not an effective way to promote culture change. Systems change is needed to support CEnR, improve accountability, and realize successful partnerships between academic institutions and communities. The dialogue among Deans focused on the topic of CEnR provided an effective method to catalyze discussion and over time may help to strengthen a culture of CEnR research.
社区参与研究(CEnR)的益处已在文献中得到证实。然而,健康研究人员对社区参与(CE)和参与式方法的采用仍然有限。波士顿大学(BU)临床转化科学研究所的社区参与计划启动了五位 BU 院长之间的讨论,以探讨他们支持学校教师进行 CEnR 实践的方法。讨论被记录下来,并对记录进行了分析,以确定和探讨出现的主题。院长们讨论的大多数策略都不是专注于改变制度系统来推进 CEnR。相反,分析表明,院长们强调的机构 CE 努力集中在“以一个人为中心的责任”或“研究导师”上。在大学中,将推广 CEnR 的责任集中在少数人身上的培养 CEnR 文化的方法可能会给领导层和研究人员带来巨大负担,并且不是促进文化变革的有效方法。需要进行系统变革以支持 CEnR,提高问责制,并实现学术机构与社区之间的成功合作。院长们之间关于 CEnR 主题的对话提供了一种有效的方法来促进讨论,并随着时间的推移可能有助于加强 CEnR 研究文化。